Maturity Framework for Operationalizing Machine Learning Applications in Health Care: Scoping Review

We investigated the implementation of MLOps in health care with a corresponding maturity framework. It is evident that only a limited number of studies reported the implementation of ML in health care contexts. Hence, it is imperative that we shift our focus toward creating an environment that supports the development of ML health care applications, such as improving existing data infrastructure, and engaging partners to support the development of MLOps applications. Specifically, we can include patients, policymakers, and health care professionals in the creation and implementation of ML applications. One of the main limitations includes the varying quality of each extracted study in terms of how the MLOps implementation was presented. Hence, it was difficult to verify the presence and discuss in depth all steps of the MLOps workflow for each study. Furthermore, due to the inherent nature of a scoping review protocol, there may be a compromise on an in-depth discussion of each step within the MLOps workflow.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2025-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/66559
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.31
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Maturity Framework for Operationalizing Machine Learning Applications in Health Care: Scoping Review

Russell Greiner, Bo Cao, Jake Hayward, Andrew J. Greenshaw et al.
2 citations
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
1.31
article

Maturity Framework for Operationalizing Machine Learning Applications in Health Care: Scoping Review

Russell Greiner, Bo Cao, Jake Hayward, Andrew J. Greenshaw, Julie Tian, Yutong Li, Ariana Xu
article en
2 citations

Abstract

We investigated the implementation of MLOps in health care with a corresponding maturity framework. It is evident that only a limited number of studies reported the implementation of ML in health care contexts. Hence, it is imperative that we shift our focus toward creating an environment that supports the development of ML health care applications, such as improving existing data infrastructure, and engaging partners to support the development of MLOps applications. Specifically, we can include patients, policymakers, and health care professionals in the creation and implementation of ML applications. One of the main limitations includes the varying quality of each extracted study in terms of how the MLOps implementation was presented. Hence, it was difficult to verify the presence and discuss in depth all steps of the MLOps workflow for each study. Furthermore, due to the inherent nature of a scoping review protocol, there may be a compromise on an in-depth discussion of each step within the MLOps workflow.

Journal of Medical Internet ResearchVol. 27
University of Alberta (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
1.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Maturity Framework for Operationalizing Machine Learning Applications in Health Care: Scoping Review — Russell Greiner, Bo Cao, et al. · Journal of Medical Internet Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS