ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE APPLICATION IN COLONOSCOPY SCREENING: A LITERATURE REVIEW

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer globally and remains a leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Despite the effectiveness of colonoscopy in reducing CRC incidence and mortality through adenoma removal, some polyps are frequently missed. Artificial intelligence (AI) has recently appeared as a promising tool to enhance detection rates during colonoscopy. Aim of the study: This study aims to compare AI-assisted colonoscopy with standard colonoscopy in terms of adenoma detection rate and polyp detection rate. The goal is to evaluate whether one approach is superior to the other. Material and methods: A systematic literature search of the PubMed database was performed for studies published between 2015 and 2025. Search terms included “artificial intelligence”, “machine learning”, “colonoscopy”, and “mass screening”. Only English-language studies directly comparing adenoma and polyp detection rates between AI and standard colonoscopy procedures were included. A total of 18 studies involving 12,000 patients met the inclusion criteria. Results: The AI group consistently demonstrated higher adenoma detection rates compared to the standard colonoscopy group, with 36.06% vs. 28.85%, respectively. Similarly, AI showcased greater polyp detection rates, detecting polyps in 41.05% of patients compared to 34.17% in the standard colonoscopy group. Advanced AI techniques reported the highest detection rates. AI showed enhanced performance in identifying diminutive lesions and polyps located in challenging regions. Importantly, AI did not significantly prolong withdrawal times. Conclusions: AI integration into colonoscopy improves adenoma and polyp detection rates across diverse patient populations and clinical settings. Even among experienced endoscopists, AI provides added diagnostic value. The findings highlight AI’s potential to enhance CRC screening, though further studies are needed to standardize AI tools, validate their efficacy in real-world settings, and assess long-term clinical outcomes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science
Published
2025-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31435/ijitss.3(47).2025.3779
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE APPLICATION IN COLONOSCOPY SCREENING: A LITERATURE REVIEW

Jan Tomczyk, Marcin Narloch, Aleksandra Żywicka, Kamila Mozga et al.
International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
article

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE APPLICATION IN COLONOSCOPY SCREENING: A LITERATURE REVIEW

Jan Tomczyk, Marcin Narloch, Aleksandra Żywicka, Kamila Mozga, Oskar Sienkiel, Mateusz Jasiński, Michał Szalach
article en

Abstract

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer globally and remains a leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Despite the effectiveness of colonoscopy in reducing CRC incidence and mortality through adenoma removal, some polyps are frequently missed. Artificial intelligence (AI) has recently appeared as a promising tool to enhance detection rates during colonoscopy. Aim of the study: This study aims to compare AI-assisted colonoscopy with standard colonoscopy in terms of adenoma detection rate and polyp detection rate. The goal is to evaluate whether one approach is superior to the other. Material and methods: A systematic literature search of the PubMed database was performed for studies published between 2015 and 2025. Search terms included “artificial intelligence”, “machine learning”, “colonoscopy”, and “mass screening”. Only English-language studies directly comparing adenoma and polyp detection rates between AI and standard colonoscopy procedures were included. A total of 18 studies involving 12,000 patients met the inclusion criteria. Results: The AI group consistently demonstrated higher adenoma detection rates compared to the standard colonoscopy group, with 36.06% vs. 28.85%, respectively. Similarly, AI showcased greater polyp detection rates, detecting polyps in 41.05% of patients compared to 34.17% in the standard colonoscopy group. Advanced AI techniques reported the highest detection rates. AI showed enhanced performance in identifying diminutive lesions and polyps located in challenging regions. Importantly, AI did not significantly prolong withdrawal times. Conclusions: AI integration into colonoscopy improves adenoma and polyp detection rates across diverse patient populations and clinical settings. Even among experienced endoscopists, AI provides added diagnostic value. The findings highlight AI’s potential to enhance CRC screening, though further studies are needed to standardize AI tools, validate their efficacy in real-world settings, and assess long-term clinical outcomes.

International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social ScienceVol. 3(3(47))
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.