‘I Didn’t Know What I Was Doing!’ Not Knowing as the Grounding for Exculpation in Automatism

Abstract A natural response to those who commit offences in highly disordered mental states is to consider that they did not know what they were doing at the time. This common response is compatible with the theoretical idea that in states of sane or insane automatism, self-awareness is lost, and our agential connection to our capacities breaks down. It is also consistent with a philosophically coherent grounding for exculpation in such cases, one based on the absence of non-observational knowledge, and on the defeat of agency that flows therefrom. The theoretical good sense in our natural response to affected agents (they did not know what they were doing!) reveals problems in the current law of automatism, and illuminates a more apt defence.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Current Legal Problems
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/cuaf012
Primary Topic
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘I Didn’t Know What I Was Doing!’ Not Knowing as the Grounding for Exculpation in Automatism

Bebhinn Donnelly-Lazarov
Current Legal Problems
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
article

‘I Didn’t Know What I Was Doing!’ Not Knowing as the Grounding for Exculpation in Automatism

Bebhinn Donnelly-Lazarov
article en

Abstract

Abstract A natural response to those who commit offences in highly disordered mental states is to consider that they did not know what they were doing at the time. This common response is compatible with the theoretical idea that in states of sane or insane automatism, self-awareness is lost, and our agential connection to our capacities breaks down. It is also consistent with a philosophically coherent grounding for exculpation in such cases, one based on the absence of non-observational knowledge, and on the defeat of agency that flows therefrom. The theoretical good sense in our natural response to affected agents (they did not know what they were doing!) reveals problems in the current law of automatism, and illuminates a more apt defence.

Current Legal ProblemsVol. 78(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.