Improving learning outcomes in engineering education with a closed-loop control system method

Education plays a critical role in equipping individuals with the knowledge, skills, and competencies necessary for success. However, traditional educational approaches often struggle to address the diverse learning paces, styles, and needs of students. This challenge is particularly pronounced in technical fields such as engineering, where personalized and adaptive learning methods are essential. This study proposes a novel approach leveraging closed-loop control systems to enhance the attainment of course learning outcomes. The proposed method is demonstrated through a case study on Circuit Analysis, a fundamental course in Electrical and Electronics Engineering. The study quantifies and systematically implements course learning outcomes using various assessment tools, including quizzes, exams, projects, and laboratory evaluations, all integrated into a closed-loop control framework. A numerical correlation is also established between course learning outcomes and broader program outcomes. Unlike traditional systems where assessment results are isolated, the proposed method incorporates adaptive mechanisms that adjust subsequent assessments and learning interventions based on earlier performance. This closed-loop approach enables personalized tracking of students' progress, tailored learning materials, and adaptive teaching strategies that address individual strengths and weaknesses. The findings indicate that closed-loop control systems can transform educational methodologies, offering a robust framework for personalized learning and maximizing students’ potential, particularly in technical disciplines. Furthermore, this approach aligns seamlessly with quality accreditation processes, making it applicable across a wide range of courses.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
European Mechanical Science
Published
2025-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26701/ems.1733766
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Experimental Learning in Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.14
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improving learning outcomes in engineering education with a closed-loop control system method

Ercan Köse
1 citations
European Mechanical Science
Experimental Learning in Engineering
1.14
article

Improving learning outcomes in engineering education with a closed-loop control system method

Ercan Köse
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Education plays a critical role in equipping individuals with the knowledge, skills, and competencies necessary for success. However, traditional educational approaches often struggle to address the diverse learning paces, styles, and needs of students. This challenge is particularly pronounced in technical fields such as engineering, where personalized and adaptive learning methods are essential. This study proposes a novel approach leveraging closed-loop control systems to enhance the attainment of course learning outcomes. The proposed method is demonstrated through a case study on Circuit Analysis, a fundamental course in Electrical and Electronics Engineering. The study quantifies and systematically implements course learning outcomes using various assessment tools, including quizzes, exams, projects, and laboratory evaluations, all integrated into a closed-loop control framework. A numerical correlation is also established between course learning outcomes and broader program outcomes. Unlike traditional systems where assessment results are isolated, the proposed method incorporates adaptive mechanisms that adjust subsequent assessments and learning interventions based on earlier performance. This closed-loop approach enables personalized tracking of students' progress, tailored learning materials, and adaptive teaching strategies that address individual strengths and weaknesses. The findings indicate that closed-loop control systems can transform educational methodologies, offering a robust framework for personalized learning and maximizing students’ potential, particularly in technical disciplines. Furthermore, this approach aligns seamlessly with quality accreditation processes, making it applicable across a wide range of courses.

European Mechanical ScienceVol. 9(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Experimental Learning in Engineering
1.14
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.