Preliminary Investigation of the Potential Health Risks of Nonform-Fitting Body Armor with a Focus on Female Warfighters

Conclusions from this study included the identification of a possible critical point for warfighter exposure to shock with air gaps between their armor and torso. This point was at a 0.5-cm air gap thickness regardless of material density, as this thickness was the most hazardous air gap size. Air gaps exceeding this thickness significantly reduced exposure, though they cannot be directly implemented into armor designs because of the increased ballistic injury risk. As the pressure exposure to the torso was shown to vary with air gap thickness, and consequently fit of the body armor, knowing the pressure externally on the body armor may not correlate to internal injuries equally for all wearers. Future work directions should investigate complex geometry armor plates to fully understand air gap injury risk effects for the wearer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Military Medicine
Published
2025-03-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usaf121
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preliminary Investigation of the Potential Health Risks of Nonform-Fitting Body Armor with a Focus on Female Warfighters

Markus Weber Sutter, Catherine E. Johnson
Military Medicine
Occupational Health and Performance
article

Preliminary Investigation of the Potential Health Risks of Nonform-Fitting Body Armor with a Focus on Female Warfighters

Markus Weber Sutter, Catherine E. Johnson
article en

Abstract

Conclusions from this study included the identification of a possible critical point for warfighter exposure to shock with air gaps between their armor and torso. This point was at a 0.5-cm air gap thickness regardless of material density, as this thickness was the most hazardous air gap size. Air gaps exceeding this thickness significantly reduced exposure, though they cannot be directly implemented into armor designs because of the increased ballistic injury risk. As the pressure exposure to the torso was shown to vary with air gap thickness, and consequently fit of the body armor, knowing the pressure externally on the body armor may not correlate to internal injuries equally for all wearers. Future work directions should investigate complex geometry armor plates to fully understand air gap injury risk effects for the wearer.

Military MedicineVol. 190(Supplement_2)
Missouri University of Science and Technology (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Occupational Health and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.