Optimality conditions for penalized sparse PCA

Abstract This paper establishes the theoretical foundations of an alternating optimization scheme for penalized sparse principal component analysis (PCA) focusing on variance maximization. We provide a theoretical foundation for the optimality of solutions derived from this widely used algorithm, addressing a gap in the current literature where empirical results often lack theoretical support. We show the algorithm’s success when the dataset’s covariance matrix is positive definite. Additionally, we characterize sparsity-inducing penalties and examine the use of various ones, including the $$ \ell _1$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>ℓ</mml:mi> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:msub> </mml:math> -norm, SCAD, and $$\ell _0$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>ℓ</mml:mi> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:msub> </mml:math> -norm. We conduct numerical experiments to evaluate standard metrics, such as explained variance, number of iterations, and computational time.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Optimization and Engineering
Published
2025-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11081-025-10021-0
Primary Topic
Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimality conditions for penalized sparse PCA

Juan C. Vera, Rosember Guerra–Urzola, Katrijn Van Deun
Optimization and Engineering
Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
article

Optimality conditions for penalized sparse PCA

Juan C. Vera, Rosember Guerra–Urzola, Katrijn Van Deun
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper establishes the theoretical foundations of an alternating optimization scheme for penalized sparse principal component analysis (PCA) focusing on variance maximization. We provide a theoretical foundation for the optimality of solutions derived from this widely used algorithm, addressing a gap in the current literature where empirical results often lack theoretical support. We show the algorithm’s success when the dataset’s covariance matrix is positive definite. Additionally, we characterize sparsity-inducing penalties and examine the use of various ones, including the $$ \ell _1$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>ℓ</mml:mi> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:msub> </mml:math> -norm, SCAD, and $$\ell _0$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>ℓ</mml:mi> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:msub> </mml:math> -norm. We conduct numerical experiments to evaluate standard metrics, such as explained variance, number of iterations, and computational time.

Optimization and Engineering
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Tilburg University (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.