Multifunctional Tetralemma. Framework for the Strategic Management of Moral Trade-offs

Abstract The issue of moral trade-offs is widely discussed in the literatures on sustainable development and stakeholder theory. Sustainability efforts often require corporate managers to balance economic, social, and environmental concerns, which frequently translate into trade-offs between legitimate stakeholder interests. We investigate how the nature of these trade-offs is illuminated by Luhmannian systems theory, particularly its vision of the polycontextural nature of the functionally differentiated society. We argue that managerial perceptions of trade-offs frequently arise from difficulties in fully grasping this polycontexturality. By applying the traditional Indian concept of tetralemma, we offer a framework that assists managers in navigating these trade-offs by emphasising the various observational perspectives associated with different function systems. Our analysis reveals that the traditional three-pillar model of sustainability is a reductionist framework that does not adequately address the incommensurability of function systems, thereby perpetuating the very issues it seeks to resolve. The adoption of the tetralemmatisation strategy we promote in this paper encourages the development of alternative corporate performance metrics that recognise the complexity of functional differentiation in evaluating corporate contributions to society.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Business Ethics
Published
2025-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-025-06138-y
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.45
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multifunctional Tetralemma. Framework for the Strategic Management of Moral Trade-offs

Vladislav Valentinov, Steffen Roth
2 citations
Journal of Business Ethics
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
4.45
article

Multifunctional Tetralemma. Framework for the Strategic Management of Moral Trade-offs

Vladislav Valentinov, Steffen Roth
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract The issue of moral trade-offs is widely discussed in the literatures on sustainable development and stakeholder theory. Sustainability efforts often require corporate managers to balance economic, social, and environmental concerns, which frequently translate into trade-offs between legitimate stakeholder interests. We investigate how the nature of these trade-offs is illuminated by Luhmannian systems theory, particularly its vision of the polycontextural nature of the functionally differentiated society. We argue that managerial perceptions of trade-offs frequently arise from difficulties in fully grasping this polycontexturality. By applying the traditional Indian concept of tetralemma, we offer a framework that assists managers in navigating these trade-offs by emphasising the various observational perspectives associated with different function systems. Our analysis reveals that the traditional three-pillar model of sustainability is a reductionist framework that does not adequately address the incommensurability of function systems, thereby perpetuating the very issues it seeks to resolve. The adoption of the tetralemmatisation strategy we promote in this paper encourages the development of alternative corporate performance metrics that recognise the complexity of functional differentiation in evaluating corporate contributions to society.

Journal of Business Ethics
Witten/Herdecke University (DE), Kazimieras Simonavičius University (LT), Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (DE), Excelia Business School (FR), Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
4.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.