Orbital Period Changes of Recurrent Nova U Scorpii Demonstrate That <i>M</i> <sub>ejecta</sub> = 26 × <i>M</i> <sub>accreted</sub>, So U Sco Is Not a Type Ia Supernova Progenitor

Abstract Recurrent nova U Scorpii (U Sco) is one of the prototypes for a Type Ia supernova progenitor. The logic is that the white dwarf is near the Chandrasekhar mass and gas is accumulating onto its surface at a near-maximal accretion rate, so it will soon increase its mass to the supernova trigger. But the white dwarf loses mass every nova eruption, so the issue is balancing the mass ejected ( M ejecta ) against the mass accreted between eruptions ( M accreted ). Measuring M accreted can be done in several ways to usable accuracy. But the old methods for measuring M ejecta (involving the flux in hydrogen emission lines) all have real error bars of 2–3 orders of magnitude. The only solution is to measure the change of the orbital period across the nova eruption (Δ P ). But this solution requires a vast photometric program of eclipse timings stretching decades. For U Sco, a program started in 1989, now reaches its culmination with measures of Δ P for the eruptions of 1999, 2010, 2016, and 2022. This paper reports on 52 new eclipse times (for a total of 218 eclipses from 1945 to 2025), plus a new theory result allowing for the confident calculation of M ejecta from Δ P . The four eruptions ejected a total of (103 ± 14) × 10 −6 M ⊙ , while the white dwarf accreted 4 × 10 −6 M ⊙ over the four previous eruption cycles. With M ejecta = 26 × M accreted , the U Sco white dwarf is losing large masses each eruption cycle, so U Sco can never produce a Type Ia supernova.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2025-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/adf961
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Orbital Period Changes of Recurrent Nova U Scorpii Demonstrate That M ejecta = 26 × M accreted, So U Sco Is Not a Type Ia Supernova Progenitor

Bradley E. Schaefer, Gordon Myers
6 citations
The Astrophysical Journal
Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
6.93
article

Orbital Period Changes of Recurrent Nova U Scorpii Demonstrate That M ejecta = 26 × M accreted, So U Sco Is Not a Type Ia Supernova Progenitor

Bradley E. Schaefer, Gordon Myers
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Abstract Recurrent nova U Scorpii (U Sco) is one of the prototypes for a Type Ia supernova progenitor. The logic is that the white dwarf is near the Chandrasekhar mass and gas is accumulating onto its surface at a near-maximal accretion rate, so it will soon increase its mass to the supernova trigger. But the white dwarf loses mass every nova eruption, so the issue is balancing the mass ejected ( M ejecta ) against the mass accreted between eruptions ( M accreted ). Measuring M accreted can be done in several ways to usable accuracy. But the old methods for measuring M ejecta (involving the flux in hydrogen emission lines) all have real error bars of 2–3 orders of magnitude. The only solution is to measure the change of the orbital period across the nova eruption (Δ P ). But this solution requires a vast photometric program of eclipse timings stretching decades. For U Sco, a program started in 1989, now reaches its culmination with measures of Δ P for the eruptions of 1999, 2010, 2016, and 2022. This paper reports on 52 new eclipse times (for a total of 218 eclipses from 1945 to 2025), plus a new theory result allowing for the confident calculation of M ejecta from Δ P . The four eruptions ejected a total of (103 ± 14) × 10 −6 M ⊙ , while the white dwarf accreted 4 × 10 −6 M ⊙ over the four previous eruption cycles. With M ejecta = 26 × M accreted , the U Sco white dwarf is losing large masses each eruption cycle, so U Sco can never produce a Type Ia supernova.

The Astrophysical JournalVol. 991(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
6.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.