Production and bromatological quality of cool-season intercropped forage

ABSTRACT: The present study assessed dry biomass production, morphological composition, nutritional value, and rumen degradation of different intercropped cool-season forage species and cultivars harvested in the pre-flowering and mealy grain stages. The materials evaluated consisted of combinations of black oat (Avena strigosa Schereb.), white oat (Avena sativa L.), and rye (Secale cereale L.). A randomized block design was used, with a 4x2 factorial scheme consisting of four forages (ABT+APP- white oat cv. GMX Tambo + black oat cv. GMX Picasso; ABT- white oat cv. GMX Tambo; APB+APP - black oats cv. GMX Bagual + black oats cv. GMX Picasso; ABT+CT - white oat cv. GMX Tambo + rye cv. Temprano), and two harvest times (pre-flowering and mealy grain), with four replicates. The different intercrops exhibited superior physical composition and; consequently, chemical composition and dry matter rumen degradation when harvested in the pre-flowering compared to the mealy grain stage. Among the different forage combinations, the 90% GMX Tambo white oat and 10% GMX Picasso black oat treatment obtained a lower stalk percentage. However, it did not differ from the other forages, whether in combination or as monoculture species, in terms of physical and bromatological composition, as well as dry matter rumen degradation. The pre-flowering stage showed more desirable bromatological characteristics for animal feed, along with a production per area similar to that of the mealy grain stage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ciência Rural
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20240065
Primary Topic
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Production and bromatological quality of cool-season intercropped forage

Daniel Corrêa Plodoviski, Mikael Neumann, Fernando de Souza Sidor, André Martins de Souza et al.
Ciência Rural
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
article

Production and bromatological quality of cool-season intercropped forage

Daniel Corrêa Plodoviski, Mikael Neumann, Fernando de Souza Sidor, André Martins de Souza, Everton Luiz Carneiro Pereira, Dayana Rochinski da Silveira Pinto, Leonardo Huçalo
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT: The present study assessed dry biomass production, morphological composition, nutritional value, and rumen degradation of different intercropped cool-season forage species and cultivars harvested in the pre-flowering and mealy grain stages. The materials evaluated consisted of combinations of black oat (Avena strigosa Schereb.), white oat (Avena sativa L.), and rye (Secale cereale L.). A randomized block design was used, with a 4x2 factorial scheme consisting of four forages (ABT+APP- white oat cv. GMX Tambo + black oat cv. GMX Picasso; ABT- white oat cv. GMX Tambo; APB+APP - black oats cv. GMX Bagual + black oats cv. GMX Picasso; ABT+CT - white oat cv. GMX Tambo + rye cv. Temprano), and two harvest times (pre-flowering and mealy grain), with four replicates. The different intercrops exhibited superior physical composition and; consequently, chemical composition and dry matter rumen degradation when harvested in the pre-flowering compared to the mealy grain stage. Among the different forage combinations, the 90% GMX Tambo white oat and 10% GMX Picasso black oat treatment obtained a lower stalk percentage. However, it did not differ from the other forages, whether in combination or as monoculture species, in terms of physical and bromatological composition, as well as dry matter rumen degradation. The pre-flowering stage showed more desirable bromatological characteristics for animal feed, along with a production per area similar to that of the mealy grain stage.

Ciência RuralVol. 55(11)
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (BR), Universidade Estadual do Centro-Oeste (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.