Trade openness and output volatility for the Japanese manufacturing industry

This study investigates the relationship between trade openness and output volatility in the Japanese manufacturing industry. It explores whether this relationship depends on the underlying economic environment and industry heterogeneity. The fixed-effect model was applied to the industry panel after estimating volatility using the residual approach. The main findings are as follows: First, openness decreased output volatility before the Plaza Accord in 1985 but increased it afterward. Second, openness decreased output volatility in lower technology sectors before 1985 and increased it thereafter. Third, openness increased output volatility in high-technology sectors before 1985 but did not affect volatility afterward. Fourth, both price and its volatility increased output volatility, while government taxes and subsidies decreased it. In conclusion, this study contributes to the understanding of the relationship between openness and volatility at the industry level by focusing on industry heterogeneity. It also provides insights into the impact of the Plaza Accord from a volatility perspective. The openness-volatility relationship depends on the economic environment and industry heterogeneity. The reversal of this relationship explains why Japanese manufacturers are less active in pursuing the global market after the Accord.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Economic and Financial Review
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55493/5002.v15i9.5582
Primary Topic
Global trade and economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trade openness and output volatility for the Japanese manufacturing industry

Kyuhyong Kim, Sangho Kim
Asian Economic and Financial Review
Global trade and economics
article

Trade openness and output volatility for the Japanese manufacturing industry

Kyuhyong Kim, Sangho Kim
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the relationship between trade openness and output volatility in the Japanese manufacturing industry. It explores whether this relationship depends on the underlying economic environment and industry heterogeneity. The fixed-effect model was applied to the industry panel after estimating volatility using the residual approach. The main findings are as follows: First, openness decreased output volatility before the Plaza Accord in 1985 but increased it afterward. Second, openness decreased output volatility in lower technology sectors before 1985 and increased it thereafter. Third, openness increased output volatility in high-technology sectors before 1985 but did not affect volatility afterward. Fourth, both price and its volatility increased output volatility, while government taxes and subsidies decreased it. In conclusion, this study contributes to the understanding of the relationship between openness and volatility at the industry level by focusing on industry heterogeneity. It also provides insights into the impact of the Plaza Accord from a volatility perspective. The openness-volatility relationship depends on the economic environment and industry heterogeneity. The reversal of this relationship explains why Japanese manufacturers are less active in pursuing the global market after the Accord.

Asian Economic and Financial ReviewVol. 15(9)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Global trade and economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.