Development and validation of a dual-dimensional career success scale for academics in Malaysian private higher education institution

Career success in academia has traditionally been assessed through objective indicators such as salary, promotions, and scholarly output, often neglecting subjective experiences like job satisfaction and work-life balance that are vital to academic fulfillment. Addressing this gap, the present study developed and validated the Dual-Dimensional Career Success Instrument (DDCS) to measure both objective and subjective aspects of career success among academicians in Malaysian Private Higher Education Institutions (PHEIs). The study employed a sequential explanatory mixed-methods design, beginning with qualitative interviews involving 14 academicians to guide item generation, followed by a quantitative survey administered to 413 academic staff. Findings revealed that academicians reported higher levels of subjective career success compared to objective measures, underscoring the salience of intrinsic values in academic career evaluation. This study contributes to the theoretical advancement of dual-dimensional career success models by contextualizing them within a non-Western academic environment. Practically, the DDCS provides higher education institutions with a robust, psychometrically sound tool to inform faculty development, career planning, and organizational policy. The instrument holds potential for broader adaptation in other professional sectors where both measurable achievements and personal fulfillment constitute career success.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Asian Social Science
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55493/5007.v15i9.5538
Primary Topic
Higher Education and Employability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and validation of a dual-dimensional career success scale for academics in Malaysian private higher education institution

Siti Aisyah Panatik, Ruzanna Shahrin, Nurul Aini Khatijah Yusof
International Journal of Asian Social Science
Higher Education and Employability
article

Development and validation of a dual-dimensional career success scale for academics in Malaysian private higher education institution

Siti Aisyah Panatik, Ruzanna Shahrin, Nurul Aini Khatijah Yusof
article en

Abstract

Career success in academia has traditionally been assessed through objective indicators such as salary, promotions, and scholarly output, often neglecting subjective experiences like job satisfaction and work-life balance that are vital to academic fulfillment. Addressing this gap, the present study developed and validated the Dual-Dimensional Career Success Instrument (DDCS) to measure both objective and subjective aspects of career success among academicians in Malaysian Private Higher Education Institutions (PHEIs). The study employed a sequential explanatory mixed-methods design, beginning with qualitative interviews involving 14 academicians to guide item generation, followed by a quantitative survey administered to 413 academic staff. Findings revealed that academicians reported higher levels of subjective career success compared to objective measures, underscoring the salience of intrinsic values in academic career evaluation. This study contributes to the theoretical advancement of dual-dimensional career success models by contextualizing them within a non-Western academic environment. Practically, the DDCS provides higher education institutions with a robust, psychometrically sound tool to inform faculty development, career planning, and organizational policy. The instrument holds potential for broader adaptation in other professional sectors where both measurable achievements and personal fulfillment constitute career success.

International Journal of Asian Social ScienceVol. 15(9)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Higher Education and Employability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.