Influence of leaf morphological properties on epiphytic lactic acid bacteria counts in forage crops

The structural properties of leaves play a crucial role in the attachment of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) in forage corps. This study analyzed the effects of leaf morphological properties, on LAB counts in different wild forage crops. The LAB counts and morphologic features on adaxial or abaxial surfaces of leaves from twelve forage species (maize (<i>Zea mays</i>), beggarticks (<i>Bidens pilosa</i>), white goosefoot (<i>Chenopodium album</i>), common bean (<i>Phaseolus vulgaris</i>), morning glory (<i>Ipomoea purpurea</i>), perilla (<i>Perilla frutescens</i>), tomato (<i>Solanum lycopersicum</i>), chili pepper (<i>Capsicum</i>), sweet potato (<i>Ipomoea batatas</i>), peanut (<i>Arachis hypogaea</i>), potato (<i>Solanum tuberosum</i>), and mallow (<i>Malva verticillata</i>)) were investigated. White goosefoot (5.22 log<sub>10</sub> CFU g<sup>-1</sup> FM) and beggarticks (4.83 log<sub>10</sub> CFU g<sup>-1</sup> FM) had the highest LAB counts but shortest leaf lengths (5.06 cm and 4.97 cm, respectively), whereas maize (3.37 log<sub>10</sub> CFU g<sup>-1</sup> FM) and sweet potato (3.38 log<sub>10</sub> CFU g<sup>-1</sup> FM) had lower LAB counts but significantly greater leaf widths than the other crops except for mallow (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Linear regression analysis revealed that the coefficients of determination (R<sup>2</sup>) between LAB counts and contact angle of the adaxial and abaxial surfaces of leaf were 0.1424 and 0.175, respectively. Therefore, the morphological features of leaves have a relatively weak influence on the LAB counts in different forage crops.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PeerJ
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.20028
Primary Topic
Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Influence of leaf morphological properties on epiphytic lactic acid bacteria counts in forage crops

Jinmei Yang, Guiting Tang, Liuxing Xu, Dan Wu et al.
PeerJ
Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology
article

Influence of leaf morphological properties on epiphytic lactic acid bacteria counts in forage crops

Jinmei Yang, Guiting Tang, Liuxing Xu, Dan Wu, Ting Sun, Guojian Tang, Gaofeng Liu
article en

Abstract

The structural properties of leaves play a crucial role in the attachment of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) in forage corps. This study analyzed the effects of leaf morphological properties, on LAB counts in different wild forage crops. The LAB counts and morphologic features on adaxial or abaxial surfaces of leaves from twelve forage species (maize (<i>Zea mays</i>), beggarticks (<i>Bidens pilosa</i>), white goosefoot (<i>Chenopodium album</i>), common bean (<i>Phaseolus vulgaris</i>), morning glory (<i>Ipomoea purpurea</i>), perilla (<i>Perilla frutescens</i>), tomato (<i>Solanum lycopersicum</i>), chili pepper (<i>Capsicum</i>), sweet potato (<i>Ipomoea batatas</i>), peanut (<i>Arachis hypogaea</i>), potato (<i>Solanum tuberosum</i>), and mallow (<i>Malva verticillata</i>)) were investigated. White goosefoot (5.22 log<sub>10</sub> CFU g<sup>-1</sup> FM) and beggarticks (4.83 log<sub>10</sub> CFU g<sup>-1</sup> FM) had the highest LAB counts but shortest leaf lengths (5.06 cm and 4.97 cm, respectively), whereas maize (3.37 log<sub>10</sub> CFU g<sup>-1</sup> FM) and sweet potato (3.38 log<sub>10</sub> CFU g<sup>-1</sup> FM) had lower LAB counts but significantly greater leaf widths than the other crops except for mallow (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Linear regression analysis revealed that the coefficients of determination (R<sup>2</sup>) between LAB counts and contact angle of the adaxial and abaxial surfaces of leaf were 0.1424 and 0.175, respectively. Therefore, the morphological features of leaves have a relatively weak influence on the LAB counts in different forage crops.

PeerJVol. 13
Zhaotong University (CN), Liupanshui Normal University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.