Abstract A093: Race, neighborhood economic segregation, and prostate cancer risk in southeastern Pennsylvania

Abstract Prostate cancer is the second most diagnosed cancer in men, with persistent racial and socioeconomic disparities in incidence and outcomes. Black men are disproportionately affected, experiencing higher rates of diagnosis and mortality than White men. This study examines geographic variation in prostate cancer incidence and whether risk varies by race and neighborhood-level economic segregation. We analyzed population-based data from the Pennsylvania Cancer Registry on 24,702 prostate cancer cases diagnosed from 2011 to 2021 across five counties in Southeast Pennsylvania. Incidence rates were examined overall and by stage (early and late). Associations between tract-level prostate cancer risk, racial composition, and economic segregation were evaluated using Poisson regression. Economic segregation was measured using quartiles of the income-based neighborhood Index of Concentration at the Extremes (nICE-income). Geographic variability in risk was assessed using Bayesian geo-additive models. The association between neighborhood economic segregation (nICE-income) and prostate cancer risk varied notably by race. Among White men, incidence was highest in the most economically privileged neighborhoods. White men in the least privileged neighborhoods had significantly lower overall risk (RR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.61–0.74), and lower early-stage (RR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.56–0.71) and late-stage (RR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.63–0.96) disease incidence. In contrast, Black men in the least privileged neighborhoods had the highest incidence. Compared to those in the most privileged areas, they had elevated overall risk (RR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.02–1.39), driven largely by late-stage disease (RR: 1.43, 95% CI: 1.15–1.96); early-stage cancer showed no significant difference in risk between the least privileged and most privileged areas (RR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.86–1.33). These opposing patterns may reflect differences in healthcare access, screening, or other social determinants. Geographic relative risk (gRR) estimates highlighted racial differences in tract-level prostate cancer risk. Among White men, gRR ranged from 0.51–1.62 (overall), 0.51–1.46 (early-stage), and 0.74–1.46 (late-stage), with statistically significant high-risk clusters in northeastern Montgomery and Bucks counties. Among Black men, gRR ranged from 0.46–1.77 (overall), 0.51–1.96 (early-stage), and 0.68–1.50 (late-stage), with statistically significant high-risk clusters in Philadelphia county. Adjustment for nICE-income attenuated late-stage clustering among Black men, suggesting a stronger mediating effect of economic segregation. These findings highlight how race and neighborhood economic conditions shape prostate cancer risk. Divergent nICE-income gradients suggest that structural socioeconomic factors impact Black and White communities differently. Results underscore the need for targeted, equity-focused cancer prevention and control strategies. Citation Format: Michelle Botyrius, Ann Klassen, PhD, Charnita Zeigler-Johnson, PhD, MPH, Jenna Kantor, MS, Scott Keith, PhD, Daniel Wiese, PhD, Kevin A. Henry, PhD. Race, neighborhood economic segregation, and prostate cancer risk in southeastern Pennsylvania [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 18th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities; 2025 Sep 18-21; Baltimore, MD. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2025;34(9 Suppl):Abstract nr A093.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7755.disp25-a093
Primary Topic
Smoking Behavior and Cessation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract A093: Race, neighborhood economic segregation, and prostate cancer risk in southeastern Pennsylvania

Michelle Botyrius, Scott W. Keith, Jenna Kantor, Kevin Henry et al.
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
Smoking Behavior and Cessation
article

Abstract A093: Race, neighborhood economic segregation, and prostate cancer risk in southeastern Pennsylvania

Michelle Botyrius, Scott W. Keith, Jenna Kantor, Kevin Henry, Daniel Wiese, Ann C. Klassen, Charnita Zeigler‐Johnson
article en

Abstract

Abstract Prostate cancer is the second most diagnosed cancer in men, with persistent racial and socioeconomic disparities in incidence and outcomes. Black men are disproportionately affected, experiencing higher rates of diagnosis and mortality than White men. This study examines geographic variation in prostate cancer incidence and whether risk varies by race and neighborhood-level economic segregation. We analyzed population-based data from the Pennsylvania Cancer Registry on 24,702 prostate cancer cases diagnosed from 2011 to 2021 across five counties in Southeast Pennsylvania. Incidence rates were examined overall and by stage (early and late). Associations between tract-level prostate cancer risk, racial composition, and economic segregation were evaluated using Poisson regression. Economic segregation was measured using quartiles of the income-based neighborhood Index of Concentration at the Extremes (nICE-income). Geographic variability in risk was assessed using Bayesian geo-additive models. The association between neighborhood economic segregation (nICE-income) and prostate cancer risk varied notably by race. Among White men, incidence was highest in the most economically privileged neighborhoods. White men in the least privileged neighborhoods had significantly lower overall risk (RR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.61–0.74), and lower early-stage (RR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.56–0.71) and late-stage (RR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.63–0.96) disease incidence. In contrast, Black men in the least privileged neighborhoods had the highest incidence. Compared to those in the most privileged areas, they had elevated overall risk (RR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.02–1.39), driven largely by late-stage disease (RR: 1.43, 95% CI: 1.15–1.96); early-stage cancer showed no significant difference in risk between the least privileged and most privileged areas (RR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.86–1.33). These opposing patterns may reflect differences in healthcare access, screening, or other social determinants. Geographic relative risk (gRR) estimates highlighted racial differences in tract-level prostate cancer risk. Among White men, gRR ranged from 0.51–1.62 (overall), 0.51–1.46 (early-stage), and 0.74–1.46 (late-stage), with statistically significant high-risk clusters in northeastern Montgomery and Bucks counties. Among Black men, gRR ranged from 0.46–1.77 (overall), 0.51–1.96 (early-stage), and 0.68–1.50 (late-stage), with statistically significant high-risk clusters in Philadelphia county. Adjustment for nICE-income attenuated late-stage clustering among Black men, suggesting a stronger mediating effect of economic segregation. These findings highlight how race and neighborhood economic conditions shape prostate cancer risk. Divergent nICE-income gradients suggest that structural socioeconomic factors impact Black and White communities differently. Results underscore the need for targeted, equity-focused cancer prevention and control strategies. Citation Format: Michelle Botyrius, Ann Klassen, PhD, Charnita Zeigler-Johnson, PhD, MPH, Jenna Kantor, MS, Scott Keith, PhD, Daniel Wiese, PhD, Kevin A. Henry, PhD. Race, neighborhood economic segregation, and prostate cancer risk in southeastern Pennsylvania [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 18th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities; 2025 Sep 18-21; Baltimore, MD. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2025;34(9 Suppl):Abstract nr A093.

Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & PreventionVol. 34(9_Supplement)
American Cancer Society (US), Fox Chase Cancer Center (US), Thomas Jefferson University (US), Drexel University (US), Temple University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Smoking Behavior and Cessation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.