Investigating the Influence of Metacognitive Strategies on all Strategies in Academic Writing

This study investigates the influence of metacognitive strategies on other writing strategies (effort regulation, cognitive, social, and affective strategies) in academic writing among undergraduates. Rooted in Social Cognitive Theory (SCT), the study aims to explore learners’ perceptions of their strategic use during the writing process. A quantitative survey design was adopted, with 105 undergraduate students responding to a 28-item instrument adapted from Raoofi et al. (2017). The survey was administered online using a 5-point Likert scale and achieved high reliability (α = .935). Findings revealed that learners moderately used all strategies, with the highest mean scores observed for affective and cognitive strategies. Correlation analysis showed a strong positive relationship between metacognitive strategies and cognitive (r = .692, p < .01), effort regulation (r = .635, p < .01), and affective strategies (r = .587, p < .01), while a moderate correlation was found with social strategies (r = .342, p < .01). These results suggest that metacognitive awareness significantly supports the use of various strategies in academic writing. The findings offer pedagogical implications for fostering strategic thinking and learner autonomy in writing instruction.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2025.908000494
Primary Topic
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating the Influence of Metacognitive Strategies on all Strategies in Academic Writing

Nadzrah Sa’adan, Noor Shahariah Saleh, Siti Aishah Taib, Fatin Aliyah Hassan et al.
International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
article

Investigating the Influence of Metacognitive Strategies on all Strategies in Academic Writing

Nadzrah Sa’adan, Noor Shahariah Saleh, Siti Aishah Taib, Fatin Aliyah Hassan, Nur Amirah Nabihah Zainal Abidin, Ruhil Nadiah Abu Bakar
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the influence of metacognitive strategies on other writing strategies (effort regulation, cognitive, social, and affective strategies) in academic writing among undergraduates. Rooted in Social Cognitive Theory (SCT), the study aims to explore learners’ perceptions of their strategic use during the writing process. A quantitative survey design was adopted, with 105 undergraduate students responding to a 28-item instrument adapted from Raoofi et al. (2017). The survey was administered online using a 5-point Likert scale and achieved high reliability (α = .935). Findings revealed that learners moderately used all strategies, with the highest mean scores observed for affective and cognitive strategies. Correlation analysis showed a strong positive relationship between metacognitive strategies and cognitive (r = .692, p < .01), effort regulation (r = .635, p < .01), and affective strategies (r = .587, p < .01), while a moderate correlation was found with social strategies (r = .342, p < .01). These results suggest that metacognitive awareness significantly supports the use of various strategies in academic writing. The findings offer pedagogical implications for fostering strategic thinking and learner autonomy in writing instruction.

International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.