M’sɨt No’kmaq

This is a paper about the structural violence of settler colonialism in relation to the limits of the planet. As settler academics, we are involved in this violence. Here, we humbly seek guidance from the land ontology of the Mi’kmaq, reflected in the concept of m’sɨt No’kmaq (All our relations) to understand differently, ourselves, our responsibilities, and our place in ‘a world on fire’ (Rupa and Patel, 2021). Guided by m’sɨt No’kmaq we seek to learn how some of the concepts that we employ in our teaching and research—specifically “trauma” and “climate change” reproduce the core of settler colonialism—the disconnection and elimination of Indigenous peoples from the land (Wildcat et al., 2014, 1). Beyond a conceptual analysis, we also consider “the coloniality of gender” (Lugones 2010, 742) in how the materiality of epistemological violence manifests on the land through state violence directed at Indigenous women, girls, and two-spirit peoples. Our learning throughout the paper shows us how colonial concepts obfuscate settlers’ own relationship to land, which simultaneously undermines the possibility of a generative ethics of settler relationality with Indigenous peoples, and the earth.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Atlantis Critical Studies in Gender Culture & Social Justice
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7202/1120031ar
Primary Topic
Anthropological Studies and Insights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

M’sɨt No’kmaq

Riley Olstead, Kim Burnett
Atlantis Critical Studies in Gender Culture & Social Justice
Anthropological Studies and Insights
article

M’sɨt No’kmaq

Riley Olstead, Kim Burnett
article en

Abstract

This is a paper about the structural violence of settler colonialism in relation to the limits of the planet. As settler academics, we are involved in this violence. Here, we humbly seek guidance from the land ontology of the Mi’kmaq, reflected in the concept of m’sɨt No’kmaq (All our relations) to understand differently, ourselves, our responsibilities, and our place in ‘a world on fire’ (Rupa and Patel, 2021). Guided by m’sɨt No’kmaq we seek to learn how some of the concepts that we employ in our teaching and research—specifically “trauma” and “climate change” reproduce the core of settler colonialism—the disconnection and elimination of Indigenous peoples from the land (Wildcat et al., 2014, 1). Beyond a conceptual analysis, we also consider “the coloniality of gender” (Lugones 2010, 742) in how the materiality of epistemological violence manifests on the land through state violence directed at Indigenous women, girls, and two-spirit peoples. Our learning throughout the paper shows us how colonial concepts obfuscate settlers’ own relationship to land, which simultaneously undermines the possibility of a generative ethics of settler relationality with Indigenous peoples, and the earth.

Atlantis Critical Studies in Gender Culture & Social JusticeVol. 46(2)
St. Francis Xavier University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Anthropological Studies and Insights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.