Quantification of <sup>18</sup> F-FDG Delivery Rate for Liver Inflammation Using Shortened Dynamic PET Imaging Protocols

Liver inflammation is a diagnostic hallmark of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), a severe form of chronic metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. <sup>18</sup>F-FDG delivery rate (<i>K</i> <sub>1</sub>) in the liver, measured by dynamic PET with tracer kinetic modeling, has the potential to assess liver inflammation and diagnose MASH noninvasively. However, a 1-h scan protocol is typically used to generate the liver [Formula: see text], which is less practical for clinical use. In this study, we aimed to investigate shortened scan protocols for quantification of liver <sup>18</sup>F-FDG [Formula: see text] in patients with MASH. <b>Methods:</b> Eighty-two subjects, including 68 patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and 14 healthy volunteers, were scanned on either a short-axial-field-of-view PET/CT scanner or a total-body PET/CT system following a full 1-h dynamic scan protocol. Two shortened scan protocols were proposed with appropriate tracer kinetic models: a 15-min dynamic scan with a 2-tissue reversible model and a 10-min dynamic scan with a 2-tissue irreversible model. Liver [Formula: see text] values generated from the shortened scan protocols were compared with those generated from the full 1-h scan and used to assess biopsy-determined liver inflammation and MASH using receiver-operating-characteristic analysis. <b>Results:</b> Liver <sup>18</sup>F-FDG [Formula: see text] values generated from the shortened scan protocols were approximately equal to [Formula: see text] values generated from the full 1-h scan. Such [Formula: see text] showed equivalent capability to differentiate between healthy, low-inflammation, and high-inflammation groups (<i>P</i> < 0.0005), similar to the [Formula: see text] obtained from a full 1-h scan. When combined with liver CT that assesses steatosis, the 2 shortened scan protocols achieved an area under the curve of 0.95 for receiver-operating-characteristic analysis when differentiating MASH and non-MASH with both scanners. <b>Conclusion:</b> It is feasible to develop a liver PET/CT parametric imaging approach using a dynamic scan of 15 min or less with an appropriate tracer kinetic model for evaluating liver inflammation and diagnosing MASH on both total-body and conventional PET scanners. The 2 proposed shortened scan protocols are more practical than the 1-h protocol for measuring liver <sup>18</sup>F-FDG [Formula: see text].

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.269434
Primary Topic
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantification of 18 F-FDG Delivery Rate for Liver Inflammation Using Shortened Dynamic PET Imaging Protocols

Karen Matsukuma, Souvik Sarkar, Victoria Lyo, Sean Romeo et al.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Quantification of 18 F-FDG Delivery Rate for Liver Inflammation Using Shortened Dynamic PET Imaging Protocols

Karen Matsukuma, Souvik Sarkar, Victoria Lyo, Sean Romeo, Valentina Medici, Ramsey Derek Badawi, Guobao Wang, Michael T. Corwin, Xiaoyu Duan, Benjamin A. Spencer
article en

Abstract

Liver inflammation is a diagnostic hallmark of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), a severe form of chronic metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. <sup>18</sup>F-FDG delivery rate (<i>K</i> <sub>1</sub>) in the liver, measured by dynamic PET with tracer kinetic modeling, has the potential to assess liver inflammation and diagnose MASH noninvasively. However, a 1-h scan protocol is typically used to generate the liver [Formula: see text], which is less practical for clinical use. In this study, we aimed to investigate shortened scan protocols for quantification of liver <sup>18</sup>F-FDG [Formula: see text] in patients with MASH. <b>Methods:</b> Eighty-two subjects, including 68 patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and 14 healthy volunteers, were scanned on either a short-axial-field-of-view PET/CT scanner or a total-body PET/CT system following a full 1-h dynamic scan protocol. Two shortened scan protocols were proposed with appropriate tracer kinetic models: a 15-min dynamic scan with a 2-tissue reversible model and a 10-min dynamic scan with a 2-tissue irreversible model. Liver [Formula: see text] values generated from the shortened scan protocols were compared with those generated from the full 1-h scan and used to assess biopsy-determined liver inflammation and MASH using receiver-operating-characteristic analysis. <b>Results:</b> Liver <sup>18</sup>F-FDG [Formula: see text] values generated from the shortened scan protocols were approximately equal to [Formula: see text] values generated from the full 1-h scan. Such [Formula: see text] showed equivalent capability to differentiate between healthy, low-inflammation, and high-inflammation groups (<i>P</i> < 0.0005), similar to the [Formula: see text] obtained from a full 1-h scan. When combined with liver CT that assesses steatosis, the 2 shortened scan protocols achieved an area under the curve of 0.95 for receiver-operating-characteristic analysis when differentiating MASH and non-MASH with both scanners. <b>Conclusion:</b> It is feasible to develop a liver PET/CT parametric imaging approach using a dynamic scan of 15 min or less with an appropriate tracer kinetic model for evaluating liver inflammation and diagnosing MASH on both total-body and conventional PET scanners. The 2 proposed shortened scan protocols are more practical than the 1-h protocol for measuring liver <sup>18</sup>F-FDG [Formula: see text].

Journal of Nuclear MedicineVol. 66(11)
University of California, Davis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.