How Is Effort Defined in Communication Sciences and Disorders? A Systematic Review of Literature

This review identifies conceptual fragmentation and measurement inconsistency in how effort is defined and operationalized across domains in communication sciences and disorders. By thematically synthesizing the literature, the review reveals a need for more integrated theoretical models and standardized assessment frameworks to advance clinical practice and research in this area. While vocal effort was the most frequently studied type, the definitions and assessment methods varied widely. The quality of the reviewed publications was diverse, with only 8% rated as strong evidence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_jslhr-25-00070
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.12
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Is Effort Defined in Communication Sciences and Disorders? A Systematic Review of Literature

Lady Catherine Cantor-Cutiva, Jeff P. Searl, Adrián Castillo‐Allendes, Susanna Whitling et al.
1 citations
Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
3.12
article

How Is Effort Defined in Communication Sciences and Disorders? A Systematic Review of Literature

Lady Catherine Cantor-Cutiva, Jeff P. Searl, Adrián Castillo‐Allendes, Susanna Whitling, Büşra Ensar, Eric J. Hunter
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This review identifies conceptual fragmentation and measurement inconsistency in how effort is defined and operationalized across domains in communication sciences and disorders. By thematically synthesizing the literature, the review reveals a need for more integrated theoretical models and standardized assessment frameworks to advance clinical practice and research in this area. While vocal effort was the most frequently studied type, the definitions and assessment methods varied widely. The quality of the reviewed publications was diverse, with only 8% rated as strong evidence.

Journal of Speech Language and Hearing ResearchVol. 68(10)
East Tennessee State University (US), University of Iowa (US), Lund University (SE), Michigan State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
3.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.