Study on the measurement accuracy of ultrasonic flow meters after ball valves

The measurement of flow in heating pipeline systems using ultrasonic flow meters can lead to poor accuracy when installation space is limited. This paper analyzes the changes in the flow field and correction coefficients at close range under different valve openings by establishing a DN50 percentage ball valve pipeline model, setting different valve openings, and adopting Turbulence Model k ,δ .To improve measurement accuracy, the article uses a non-uniform mesh straightener to optimize the flow field and compares three straightener design schemes with hole diameters of 0.1D, 0.13D, and 0.17D. The results show that: the 0.13D option has a maximum pressure loss of only 255.9 Pa and a minimum pressure loss of 151.4 Pa. The relative error of the flow coefficient can be generally controlled within 3%, meeting the requirements for the measurement accuracy of ultrasonic flow meters under various operating conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3082713
Primary Topic
Flow Measurement and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Study on the measurement accuracy of ultrasonic flow meters after ball valves

zhibo liu, Guo Wei-jun, Duojiao Guan, Zhongquan Charlie Zheng et al.
Flow Measurement and Analysis
article

Study on the measurement accuracy of ultrasonic flow meters after ball valves

zhibo liu, Guo Wei-jun, Duojiao Guan, Zhongquan Charlie Zheng, Weiqi Liu, Siyi Mo
article en

Abstract

The measurement of flow in heating pipeline systems using ultrasonic flow meters can lead to poor accuracy when installation space is limited. This paper analyzes the changes in the flow field and correction coefficients at close range under different valve openings by establishing a DN50 percentage ball valve pipeline model, setting different valve openings, and adopting Turbulence Model k ,δ .To improve measurement accuracy, the article uses a non-uniform mesh straightener to optimize the flow field and compares three straightener design schemes with hole diameters of 0.1D, 0.13D, and 0.17D. The results show that: the 0.13D option has a maximum pressure loss of only 255.9 Pa and a minimum pressure loss of 151.4 Pa. The relative error of the flow coefficient can be generally controlled within 3%, meeting the requirements for the measurement accuracy of ultrasonic flow meters under various operating conditions.

Shenyang Institute of Engineering (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Flow Measurement and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.