Continuity Is Essential: The Experiences of Co‐Design Participants During the Implementation of a New Health Service

This was an exploration of the experiences of co-design participants involved in the design of a new service during the implementation of the service. The co-design team included representatives from a university, primary healthcare, acute care services and health consumers. This study was informed by previous qualitative interviews with co-design participants, including two health consumers. These interviews were undertaken during the design phase of the co-design, and their findings were presented to co-design participants (written plain language and an oral presentation), and they gave feedback on these. Two co-design participants were regularly involved in discussions about the research methods, in particular, recruitment and timing of the research. A written summary of the findings from interviews during service implementation was shared with participants, who had an opportunity to provide feedback. One co-design participant contributed to the 'Discussion' section of the manuscript, in particular the implications arising from this study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Expectations
Published
2025-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.70436
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Continuity Is Essential: The Experiences of Co‐Design Participants During the Implementation of a New Health Service

Emily Hansen, Kelly Shaw, Tania Winzenberg, Claire Morley et al.
Health Expectations
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
article

Continuity Is Essential: The Experiences of Co‐Design Participants During the Implementation of a New Health Service

Emily Hansen, Kelly Shaw, Tania Winzenberg, Claire Morley, Deirdre A. McGowan
article en

Abstract

This was an exploration of the experiences of co-design participants involved in the design of a new service during the implementation of the service. The co-design team included representatives from a university, primary healthcare, acute care services and health consumers. This study was informed by previous qualitative interviews with co-design participants, including two health consumers. These interviews were undertaken during the design phase of the co-design, and their findings were presented to co-design participants (written plain language and an oral presentation), and they gave feedback on these. Two co-design participants were regularly involved in discussions about the research methods, in particular, recruitment and timing of the research. A written summary of the findings from interviews during service implementation was shared with participants, who had an opportunity to provide feedback. One co-design participant contributed to the 'Discussion' section of the manuscript, in particular the implications arising from this study.

Health ExpectationsVol. 28(5)
University of Tasmania (AU), Hobart Private Hospital (AU), Department of Natural Resources and Environment Tasmania (AU)
Australian Government, University of Tasmania
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.