Assessing Beliefs About Cryptocurrencies: Development and Validation of the Scale of Beliefs About Cryptocurrencies (SBaC)

The technological revolution of the last decades has revolutionized economic interactions, introducing new paradigms like e‐banking and cryptocurrencies. Although the literature has questioned the antecedents associated with the use of cryptocurrencies and, in particular, the attitudes and beliefs underlying them, there is still a lack of a robust, multidimensional tool to measure beliefs about cryptocurrencies. Therefore, the aim of the study is to preliminarily validate a brand‐new scale for a comprehensive assessment of beliefs related to cryptocurrencies: the scale of beliefs about cryptocurrencies (SBaC). The first version of the scale was tested on 395 Italian‐speaking participants (53.1% were women, mean age 27.44 years, SD = 11.03). Thirteen percent of the sample also held cryptocurrencies at the time of completing the questionnaire. The results of the exploratory factor analysis (EFA) showed that the SBaC, with a total of 12 items, has four factors: (i) self‐fulfillment, related to achieving independence and goals through cryptocurrencies; (ii) investment, indicating potential profitability; (iii) cryptocurrencies as a medium of exchange, as an alternative for transactions; and (iv) locus of control, related to individual attribution of success or failure in the crypto market. The results of the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) on an independent sample ( N = 133, mean age = 34.47, SD = 11.79) confirm the four‐factor structure of the scale. The correlation analysis showed that positive beliefs toward cryptocurrencies as a medium of exchange and as investments are significantly correlated with willingness to engage and hold cryptocurrencies. Internal locus of control negatively correlates with willingness to engage with cryptocurrencies but does not significantly affect the amount held or investment willingness. Social influence plays a role in shaping perceptions of cryptocurrencies as a medium of exchange and investment but does not significantly impact locus of control or self‐fulfillment. Self‐fulfillment is positively correlated with willingness to engage with cryptocurrencies and investment willingness, albeit with weaker correlations. This study showed that the SBaC is a valuable tool for assessing cryptocurrencies’ beliefs, predicting behavioral intentions, and understanding cognitive processes driving engagement with digital currencies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/hbe2/6251242
Primary Topic
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Beliefs About Cryptocurrencies: Development and Validation of the Scale of Beliefs About Cryptocurrencies (SBaC)

Alessio Luciano Licata, Elena Serritella, Mirko Duradoni, Andrea Guazzini et al.
Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
article

Assessing Beliefs About Cryptocurrencies: Development and Validation of the Scale of Beliefs About Cryptocurrencies (SBaC)

Alessio Luciano Licata, Elena Serritella, Mirko Duradoni, Andrea Guazzini, Martina Bellotti
article en

Abstract

The technological revolution of the last decades has revolutionized economic interactions, introducing new paradigms like e‐banking and cryptocurrencies. Although the literature has questioned the antecedents associated with the use of cryptocurrencies and, in particular, the attitudes and beliefs underlying them, there is still a lack of a robust, multidimensional tool to measure beliefs about cryptocurrencies. Therefore, the aim of the study is to preliminarily validate a brand‐new scale for a comprehensive assessment of beliefs related to cryptocurrencies: the scale of beliefs about cryptocurrencies (SBaC). The first version of the scale was tested on 395 Italian‐speaking participants (53.1% were women, mean age 27.44 years, SD = 11.03). Thirteen percent of the sample also held cryptocurrencies at the time of completing the questionnaire. The results of the exploratory factor analysis (EFA) showed that the SBaC, with a total of 12 items, has four factors: (i) self‐fulfillment, related to achieving independence and goals through cryptocurrencies; (ii) investment, indicating potential profitability; (iii) cryptocurrencies as a medium of exchange, as an alternative for transactions; and (iv) locus of control, related to individual attribution of success or failure in the crypto market. The results of the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) on an independent sample ( N = 133, mean age = 34.47, SD = 11.79) confirm the four‐factor structure of the scale. The correlation analysis showed that positive beliefs toward cryptocurrencies as a medium of exchange and as investments are significantly correlated with willingness to engage and hold cryptocurrencies. Internal locus of control negatively correlates with willingness to engage with cryptocurrencies but does not significantly affect the amount held or investment willingness. Social influence plays a role in shaping perceptions of cryptocurrencies as a medium of exchange and investment but does not significantly impact locus of control or self‐fulfillment. Self‐fulfillment is positively correlated with willingness to engage with cryptocurrencies and investment willingness, albeit with weaker correlations. This study showed that the SBaC is a valuable tool for assessing cryptocurrencies’ beliefs, predicting behavioral intentions, and understanding cognitive processes driving engagement with digital currencies.

Human Behavior and Emerging TechnologiesVol. 2025(1)
Mercatorum University (IT), University of Florence (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.