Reconstructing complexity: Indications for simultaneous and chimeric free flaps in extensive maxillofacial defects

Reconstructing complex head and neck defects using multiple simultaneous or chimeric microvascular free flaps is rare, with no established guidelines on indications. This study evaluates the indications, flap combinations, outcomes, and complications associated with these techniques in maxillofacial reconstruction. A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent either two simultaneous free flaps or chimeric free flaps for head and neck defects between February 2018 and December 2024. Flap success rates and complication rates were assessed. Twenty-two patients received simultaneous free flaps, with a flap-level success rate of 91 % and a complication rate of 55 %. The most common combination was a fibula free flap with an anterolateral thigh flap. Thirty-six patients underwent chimeric flap reconstruction, achieving a success rate of 94 % and a complication rate of 39 %. Indications for these reconstructions fell into three broad categories: extensive composite defects, complex extraoral defects requiring additional bone reconstruction, and defects involving compromised tissues due to prior radiotherapy or multiple surgeries. Chimeric flaps are a viable option for addressing complex defects in more vulnerable patients, while simultaneous free flaps are feasible for selected cases. Despite acceptable success rates, the elevated complication risks associated with simultaneous flaps necessitate vigilant postoperative monitoring.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2025.09.003
Primary Topic
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reconstructing complexity: Indications for simultaneous and chimeric free flaps in extensive maxillofacial defects

Claudius Steffen, Christian Doll, Norbert Neckel, Carsten Rendenbach et al.
Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
article

Reconstructing complexity: Indications for simultaneous and chimeric free flaps in extensive maxillofacial defects

Claudius Steffen, Christian Doll, Norbert Neckel, Carsten Rendenbach, Kilian Kreutzer, Steffen Koerdt, Henri Kreiker, Max Heiland, Philipp Lampert, Jakob Fenske
article en

Abstract

Reconstructing complex head and neck defects using multiple simultaneous or chimeric microvascular free flaps is rare, with no established guidelines on indications. This study evaluates the indications, flap combinations, outcomes, and complications associated with these techniques in maxillofacial reconstruction. A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent either two simultaneous free flaps or chimeric free flaps for head and neck defects between February 2018 and December 2024. Flap success rates and complication rates were assessed. Twenty-two patients received simultaneous free flaps, with a flap-level success rate of 91 % and a complication rate of 55 %. The most common combination was a fibula free flap with an anterolateral thigh flap. Thirty-six patients underwent chimeric flap reconstruction, achieving a success rate of 94 % and a complication rate of 39 %. Indications for these reconstructions fell into three broad categories: extensive composite defects, complex extraoral defects requiring additional bone reconstruction, and defects involving compromised tissues due to prior radiotherapy or multiple surgeries. Chimeric flaps are a viable option for addressing complex defects in more vulnerable patients, while simultaneous free flaps are feasible for selected cases. Despite acceptable success rates, the elevated complication risks associated with simultaneous flaps necessitate vigilant postoperative monitoring.

Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial SurgeryVol. 53(11)
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.