Revisiting LLMs and Lung Cancer Questions: How AI Responds to Common Lung Cancer Questions Two Years Later

GPT-o3-mini showed the best overall accuracy among the models tested but had notable inter-rater variability. While GPT-o3-mini and Gemini showed improved accuracy (75.83% and 74.17%) over their older iterations in prior assessments (GPT-3.5 70.8%, Bard 51.7%), ongoing issues persist. Nearly two years later, problems such as inconsistent performance, incorrect responses, and refusals emphasize the continued importance of expert oversight.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Academic Radiology
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2025.08.056
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revisiting LLMs and Lung Cancer Questions: How AI Responds to Common Lung Cancer Questions Two Years Later

Cameron Hassani, Amir Ali Rahsepar, Grace Hyun J. Kim, Hamid Chalian et al.
Academic Radiology
Topic Modeling
article

Revisiting LLMs and Lung Cancer Questions: How AI Responds to Common Lung Cancer Questions Two Years Later

Cameron Hassani, Amir Ali Rahsepar, Grace Hyun J. Kim, Hamid Chalian, Dan Nguyen, Arash Bedayat
article en

Abstract

GPT-o3-mini showed the best overall accuracy among the models tested but had notable inter-rater variability. While GPT-o3-mini and Gemini showed improved accuracy (75.83% and 74.17%) over their older iterations in prior assessments (GPT-3.5 70.8%, Bard 51.7%), ongoing issues persist. Nearly two years later, problems such as inconsistent performance, incorrect responses, and refusals emphasize the continued importance of expert oversight.

Academic RadiologyVol. 32(12)
University of California, Los Angeles (US), University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US), University of Washington (US), Northwestern Memorial Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Topic Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.