Examining Platforms’ Affordances: Bridging Journalists’ and Users’ Practices of Online Engagement

Digital technologies, especially social media platforms, are crucial to journalism’s engagement with audiences. Journalists depend on these information technologies to distribute news, while users largely rely on social media platforms for informing themselves. However, research on the role of platforms in journalism appears to have mainly focused on the risks they pose to the profession with little attention given to how platforms’ affordances facilitate engagement. The aim of this study is to examine how the expectations of journalists and users about the role of digital platforms coincide or differ in terms of the affordances for engagement with each other. We conducted in-depth interviews with 31 news users and 10 professional journalists in Chile, focusing on their use of social media related to news. Our study reveals some alignments and misalignments on the platforms’ digital affordances in three dimensions: contextual flexibility, informational access and use, and interactive communication. Journalists primarily focus on mobile use on the go, while users often access news at home. Both groups align on the exposure function of platforms but differ in their perceptions of content personalization and availability. Additionally, while journalists encourage interaction, users are often reluctant to engage deeply or are unaware of these expectations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Digital Journalism
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2025.2559370
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining Platforms’ Affordances: Bridging Journalists’ and Users’ Practices of Online Engagement

Irene Costera Meijer, David Domingo, Constanza Gajardo
Digital Journalism
Social Media and Politics
article

Examining Platforms’ Affordances: Bridging Journalists’ and Users’ Practices of Online Engagement

Irene Costera Meijer, David Domingo, Constanza Gajardo
article en

Abstract

Digital technologies, especially social media platforms, are crucial to journalism’s engagement with audiences. Journalists depend on these information technologies to distribute news, while users largely rely on social media platforms for informing themselves. However, research on the role of platforms in journalism appears to have mainly focused on the risks they pose to the profession with little attention given to how platforms’ affordances facilitate engagement. The aim of this study is to examine how the expectations of journalists and users about the role of digital platforms coincide or differ in terms of the affordances for engagement with each other. We conducted in-depth interviews with 31 news users and 10 professional journalists in Chile, focusing on their use of social media related to news. Our study reveals some alignments and misalignments on the platforms’ digital affordances in three dimensions: contextual flexibility, informational access and use, and interactive communication. Journalists primarily focus on mobile use on the go, while users often access news at home. Both groups align on the exposure function of platforms but differ in their perceptions of content personalization and availability. Additionally, while journalists encourage interaction, users are often reluctant to engage deeply or are unaware of these expectations.

Digital Journalism
Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE), University of Concepción (CL), Universidad Nacional de Concepción (PY), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Social Media and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.