Alexander of Aphrodisias, Dialectic, and the First Principles of Science

Abstract Alexander of Aphrodisias’ Commentary on the Topics tackles a thorny issue in Aristotelian scholarship: the place of dialectic in inquiries about the first principles of science. The commentary offers several dialectical syllogisms whose conclusions are first principles of geometry (namely, the definitions of point, line, and surface). However, by themselves, his examples do not clarify the epistemic strength of these dialectical syllogisms. I argue that, for Alexander, preconceptions furnish us with a subset of premises that warrant the truth of conclusions reached on their basis, and that the content of preconceptions can be used as accredited opinions ( endoxa ).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Phronesis
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/15685284-bja10113
Primary Topic
Classical Philosophy and Thought
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Alexander of Aphrodisias, Dialectic, and the First Principles of Science

Ismaël Kettani
Phronesis
Classical Philosophy and Thought
article

Alexander of Aphrodisias, Dialectic, and the First Principles of Science

Ismaël Kettani
article en

Abstract

Abstract Alexander of Aphrodisias’ Commentary on the Topics tackles a thorny issue in Aristotelian scholarship: the place of dialectic in inquiries about the first principles of science. The commentary offers several dialectical syllogisms whose conclusions are first principles of geometry (namely, the definitions of point, line, and surface). However, by themselves, his examples do not clarify the epistemic strength of these dialectical syllogisms. I argue that, for Alexander, preconceptions furnish us with a subset of premises that warrant the truth of conclusions reached on their basis, and that the content of preconceptions can be used as accredited opinions ( endoxa ).

Phronesis
University of Toronto (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Classical Philosophy and Thought
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.