Recreational survey data indicates decades of overfishing of European lobster (Homarus gammarus)

Abstract Marine recreational fishing (MRF) is a popular outdoor activity that contributes substantially to total harvest in many coastal stocks, yet it is rarely integrated into stock assessments and its impact on target stocks is often unknown. For the red-listed European lobster ( Homarus gammarus ) in Norway , we applied two probabilistic off-site survey methods (diary and recall) to estimate participation, effort, harvest rates and total harvest across regions. The effects of accounting for MRF were then evaluated in a stock assessment model. The recall method achieved higher response rates and resulted in slightly lower harvest estimates than the diary survey. When combined with a mandatory national registration system, these methods enabled cost-efficient and representative estimation of total harvest. Recreational fishers accounted for 71–90% of total lobster removals, confirming their dominant role in the fishery. If recreational harvest was not accounted for, the stock status was overestimated, while current fishing pressure was significantly underestimated. Our findings demonstrate that excluding MRF can mask unsustainable exploitation of an overexploited stock and hinder effective management. We show that combining registration with low-burden methods provides practical and reliable foundation for incorporating MRF into stock assessments, a first step towards achieving sustainable coastal fisheries management. Graphical abstract

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-025-09991-2
Primary Topic
Marine and fisheries research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Recreational survey data indicates decades of overfishing of European lobster (Homarus gammarus)

Alf Ring Kleiven, Fabian Zimmermann, JM Lyle, Johanna Bjånes Marcussen
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
Marine and fisheries research
article

Recreational survey data indicates decades of overfishing of European lobster (Homarus gammarus)

Alf Ring Kleiven, Fabian Zimmermann, JM Lyle, Johanna Bjånes Marcussen
article en

Abstract

Abstract Marine recreational fishing (MRF) is a popular outdoor activity that contributes substantially to total harvest in many coastal stocks, yet it is rarely integrated into stock assessments and its impact on target stocks is often unknown. For the red-listed European lobster ( Homarus gammarus ) in Norway , we applied two probabilistic off-site survey methods (diary and recall) to estimate participation, effort, harvest rates and total harvest across regions. The effects of accounting for MRF were then evaluated in a stock assessment model. The recall method achieved higher response rates and resulted in slightly lower harvest estimates than the diary survey. When combined with a mandatory national registration system, these methods enabled cost-efficient and representative estimation of total harvest. Recreational fishers accounted for 71–90% of total lobster removals, confirming their dominant role in the fishery. If recreational harvest was not accounted for, the stock status was overestimated, while current fishing pressure was significantly underestimated. Our findings demonstrate that excluding MRF can mask unsustainable exploitation of an overexploited stock and hinder effective management. We show that combining registration with low-burden methods provides practical and reliable foundation for incorporating MRF into stock assessments, a first step towards achieving sustainable coastal fisheries management. Graphical abstract

Reviews in Fish Biology and FisheriesVol. 35(4)
University of Tasmania (AU), University of Agder (NO), Norwegian Institute of Marine Research (NO)
Norges Forskningsråd, Interreg
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Marine and fisheries research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.