EFFECTS OF FOUR FOUNDATIONS OF MINDFULNESS-BASED INTERVENTION (FFMBI) ON MINDFULNESS LEVELS OF INTERNATIONAL PRACTITIONERS AND MENTAL WELL-BEING OF HUNGARIAN PRACTITIONERS

This cross-context synthesis combines results from two intensive Four Foundations of Mindfulness–based interventions (FFMBI) delivered in distinct higher-education settings: (1) residential retreats for international university students in Thailand (15-day, n=55; 30-day, n=15) and (2) a seven-day residential retreat for Hungarian adult learners in Mánfa, Hungary (n=25). In Thailand, participants completed the FFMQ-39 and DASS-21 before and after retreat. The 15-day cohort showed a small but significant gain in dispositional mindfulness (FFMQ-Total Δ=+4.20; d=0.28; p=.043); the 30-day cohort showed a larger, medium-sized increase (Δ=+10.20; d=0.46; p=.094, underpowered). Reductions in distress were modest, with trend-level decreases in stress for 15-day attendees. Critically, mindfulness gains correlated with reductions in stress, anxiety, and depression. Feasibility and acceptability were high (environment ratings M=3.91/5; 90% would re-attend), and descriptive patterns suggested a dose–response favouring longer retreats. In Hungary, a pre–post analysis employed STAI (State/Trait), FFMQ-15, Self-Compassion Scale (SCS), DASS-42, and WHO-5. Large and clinically meaningful improvements were observed in state anxiety (STAI-S Δ=−10.44; d=−0.94; p<.001), with medium-to-large gains in trait anxiety (STAI-T d=−0.65; p=.004), depression (d=−0.77; p<.001), stress (d=−0.64; p=.004), and well-being (WHO-5 +10.56 percentage points; d=0.67; p=.003). Self-compassion improved (SCS total d=0.50; p=.029), particularly Over-identification (d=0.51; p=.017). FFMQ-15 facet changes were mixed. Across 7-, 15-, and 30-day formats, FFMBI appears feasible and acceptable for both international and Hungarian cohorts, yielding consistent pre–post reductions in psychological distress and improvements in either mindfulness (longer formats) and self-compassion/well-being (shorter format). Combined evidence hints at a dose–response for trait mindfulness with longer intensives, while even a seven-day retreat delivers substantial relief in anxiety, depression, and stress. Limitations include single-group pre–post designs, self-report measures, attrition (international cohort), and unequal cell sizes. Nonetheless, converging quantitative and qualitative indicators support FFMBI as a scalable option for student mental-health support in culturally distinct settings, and they motivate controlled trials comparing retreat lengths and tracking maintenance of gains.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
LIFE International Journal of Health and Life-Sciences
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20319/icrlsh.2025.5960
Primary Topic
Resilience and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EFFECTS OF FOUR FOUNDATIONS OF MINDFULNESS-BASED INTERVENTION (FFMBI) ON MINDFULNESS LEVELS OF INTERNATIONAL PRACTITIONERS AND MENTAL WELL-BEING OF HUNGARIAN PRACTITIONERS

Nadnapang Phophichit
LIFE International Journal of Health and Life-Sciences
Resilience and Mental Health
article

EFFECTS OF FOUR FOUNDATIONS OF MINDFULNESS-BASED INTERVENTION (FFMBI) ON MINDFULNESS LEVELS OF INTERNATIONAL PRACTITIONERS AND MENTAL WELL-BEING OF HUNGARIAN PRACTITIONERS

Nadnapang Phophichit
article en

Abstract

This cross-context synthesis combines results from two intensive Four Foundations of Mindfulness–based interventions (FFMBI) delivered in distinct higher-education settings: (1) residential retreats for international university students in Thailand (15-day, n=55; 30-day, n=15) and (2) a seven-day residential retreat for Hungarian adult learners in Mánfa, Hungary (n=25). In Thailand, participants completed the FFMQ-39 and DASS-21 before and after retreat. The 15-day cohort showed a small but significant gain in dispositional mindfulness (FFMQ-Total Δ=+4.20; d=0.28; p=.043); the 30-day cohort showed a larger, medium-sized increase (Δ=+10.20; d=0.46; p=.094, underpowered). Reductions in distress were modest, with trend-level decreases in stress for 15-day attendees. Critically, mindfulness gains correlated with reductions in stress, anxiety, and depression. Feasibility and acceptability were high (environment ratings M=3.91/5; 90% would re-attend), and descriptive patterns suggested a dose–response favouring longer retreats. In Hungary, a pre–post analysis employed STAI (State/Trait), FFMQ-15, Self-Compassion Scale (SCS), DASS-42, and WHO-5. Large and clinically meaningful improvements were observed in state anxiety (STAI-S Δ=−10.44; d=−0.94; p<.001), with medium-to-large gains in trait anxiety (STAI-T d=−0.65; p=.004), depression (d=−0.77; p<.001), stress (d=−0.64; p=.004), and well-being (WHO-5 +10.56 percentage points; d=0.67; p=.003). Self-compassion improved (SCS total d=0.50; p=.029), particularly Over-identification (d=0.51; p=.017). FFMQ-15 facet changes were mixed. Across 7-, 15-, and 30-day formats, FFMBI appears feasible and acceptable for both international and Hungarian cohorts, yielding consistent pre–post reductions in psychological distress and improvements in either mindfulness (longer formats) and self-compassion/well-being (shorter format). Combined evidence hints at a dose–response for trait mindfulness with longer intensives, while even a seven-day retreat delivers substantial relief in anxiety, depression, and stress. Limitations include single-group pre–post designs, self-report measures, attrition (international cohort), and unequal cell sizes. Nonetheless, converging quantitative and qualitative indicators support FFMBI as a scalable option for student mental-health support in culturally distinct settings, and they motivate controlled trials comparing retreat lengths and tracking maintenance of gains.

LIFE International Journal of Health and Life-Sciences
Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalaya University (TH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Resilience and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.