Measuring the socio-economic and environmental outcomes of regenerative agriculture across spatio-temporal scales

Regenerative agriculture aims to produce food while simultaneously improving soil health, supporting biodiversity, reducing input costs and enhancing climate resilience. Evidence on its environmental and socio-economic impacts across different systems and climates remains limited, with few studies measuring multiple outcomes following whole farming system transition. To be impactful, regenerative agriculture research must address farmers' knowledge needs and provide practically feasible, economically viable solutions. This can be achieved through action-based research, co-designed with farmer stakeholders in real-world settings. Such research is time-consuming and involves potential risk for farmers adopting new practice combinations. Here, we describe two UK research projects gathering evidence on regenerative agriculture in partnership with farmers, at different scales. One is a replicated large-plot trial that stacks regenerative principles, the other a farmer-led quasi-experiment, following the transition in active farm businesses and using a flexible scoring system based on regenerative principles. We highlight benefits, challenges and future research directions emerging from these projects, including: challenges defining regenerative agriculture; co-design and maximizing knowledge exchange; generalizing results beyond study sites, when practices and outcomes are context-dependent; the need for interdisciplinarity; and generating evidence on long-term transitions with time lags between system change and outcomes, in an environment of short-term funding.This article is part of the theme issue 'Transforming terrestrial food systems for human and planetary health'.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2024.0157
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.87

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring the socio-economic and environmental outcomes of regenerative agriculture across spatio-temporal scales

Coline C. Jaworski, Tim J. Daniell, Penelope J. Watt, Lisa Collins et al.
4 citations
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
6.87
article

Measuring the socio-economic and environmental outcomes of regenerative agriculture across spatio-temporal scales

Coline C. Jaworski, Tim J. Daniell, Penelope J. Watt, Lisa Collins, Niamh M. McHugh, Lynn V. Dicks, Peter Jackson, Bob Doherty, Katherine A. Berthon, Pippa J. Chapman, Ruth N. Wade, Jonathan R. Leake, Yu Zhao
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Regenerative agriculture aims to produce food while simultaneously improving soil health, supporting biodiversity, reducing input costs and enhancing climate resilience. Evidence on its environmental and socio-economic impacts across different systems and climates remains limited, with few studies measuring multiple outcomes following whole farming system transition. To be impactful, regenerative agriculture research must address farmers' knowledge needs and provide practically feasible, economically viable solutions. This can be achieved through action-based research, co-designed with farmer stakeholders in real-world settings. Such research is time-consuming and involves potential risk for farmers adopting new practice combinations. Here, we describe two UK research projects gathering evidence on regenerative agriculture in partnership with farmers, at different scales. One is a replicated large-plot trial that stacks regenerative principles, the other a farmer-led quasi-experiment, following the transition in active farm businesses and using a flexible scoring system based on regenerative principles. We highlight benefits, challenges and future research directions emerging from these projects, including: challenges defining regenerative agriculture; co-design and maximizing knowledge exchange; generalizing results beyond study sites, when practices and outcomes are context-dependent; the need for interdisciplinarity; and generating evidence on long-term transitions with time lags between system change and outcomes, in an environment of short-term funding.This article is part of the theme issue 'Transforming terrestrial food systems for human and planetary health'.

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesVol. 380(1935)
University of Leeds (GB), Université Côte d'Azur (FR), University of Cambridge (GB), University of Surrey (GB), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Institut Sophia Agrobiotech (FR), University of York (GB), Game & Wildlife Conservation Trust (GB), University of Sheffield (GB)
Game and Wildlife Conservation Trust
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
6.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.