Inferring the Controlling Factors of Ice Aggregation from Targeted Cloud Seeding Experiments

Abstract. Ice aggregation in clouds plays a crucial role in cloud development and precipitation formation. Despite the significance of ice aggregation, direct in situ quantification of aggregation rates in natural clouds has been challenging due to the difficulty of tracking ice crystals. Here, we present in situ measurements of ice aggregation rates in persistent supercooled stratiform clouds. Using novel glaciogenic seeding experiments (CLOUDLAB), ice crystals are nucleated upwind and subsequently measured downwind after a known residence time in cloud, allowing us to estimate their age. A deep-learning-based detection algorithm (IceDetectNet) counts the individual monomers of aggregates to derive the initial ice crystal number concentration (ICNCt0). We considered several factors that may influence ice aggregation, including ICNCt0, temperature, particle size, aspect ratio, and turbulence. Among these, ICNCt0 was found to be the dominant factor controlling aggregation rates by three independent approaches: causal inference, a physical equation, and machine learning models. We report, however, a subquadratic dependence of the aggregation rate on ICNCt0 (mean exponent ~0.92), in contrast to theoretical expectations (quadratic dependence). One possible explanation is that aggregation may also involve smaller ice crystals, but this remains hypothetical. To predict aggregation rates, we evaluated 11 machine learning models and a physically based formulation. CatBoost achieved the best statistical performance, while the physical model proved more robust in sensitivity tests. These findings provide new insights into the microphysical and environmental controls of ice aggregation and establish a robust methodological foundation for studying aggregation processes in natural clouds.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4397
Primary Topic
Icing and De-icing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inferring the Controlling Factors of Ice Aggregation from Targeted Cloud Seeding Experiments

Nadja Omanovic, Jan Henneberger, Ulrike Lohmann, Fabiola Ramelli et al.
Icing and De-icing Technologies
article

Inferring the Controlling Factors of Ice Aggregation from Targeted Cloud Seeding Experiments

Nadja Omanovic, Jan Henneberger, Ulrike Lohmann, Fabiola Ramelli, Anna J. Miller, Robert Spirig, Huiying Zhang, Christopher Fuchs, Zhaolong Wu, Yunpei Chu
article en

Abstract

Abstract. Ice aggregation in clouds plays a crucial role in cloud development and precipitation formation. Despite the significance of ice aggregation, direct in situ quantification of aggregation rates in natural clouds has been challenging due to the difficulty of tracking ice crystals. Here, we present in situ measurements of ice aggregation rates in persistent supercooled stratiform clouds. Using novel glaciogenic seeding experiments (CLOUDLAB), ice crystals are nucleated upwind and subsequently measured downwind after a known residence time in cloud, allowing us to estimate their age. A deep-learning-based detection algorithm (IceDetectNet) counts the individual monomers of aggregates to derive the initial ice crystal number concentration (ICNCt0). We considered several factors that may influence ice aggregation, including ICNCt0, temperature, particle size, aspect ratio, and turbulence. Among these, ICNCt0 was found to be the dominant factor controlling aggregation rates by three independent approaches: causal inference, a physical equation, and machine learning models. We report, however, a subquadratic dependence of the aggregation rate on ICNCt0 (mean exponent ~0.92), in contrast to theoretical expectations (quadratic dependence). One possible explanation is that aggregation may also involve smaller ice crystals, but this remains hypothetical. To predict aggregation rates, we evaluated 11 machine learning models and a physically based formulation. CatBoost achieved the best statistical performance, while the physical model proved more robust in sensitivity tests. These findings provide new insights into the microphysical and environmental controls of ice aggregation and establish a robust methodological foundation for studying aggregation processes in natural clouds.

ETH Zurich (CH), Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric Research (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Icing and De-icing Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.