Listening at different scales: Sociolinguistic perception and the listening subject

Abstract This commentary argues that sociophonetic perception studies and linguistic anthropological analyses of the listening subject examine the same underlying process—ideologically structured listening—though at different observational scales. Drawing on Inoue's foundational work and subsequent research on enregisterment, mediatization, and indexical inversion, I show how experimental and ethnographic approaches each illuminate complementary dimensions of listening as both cognitive and sociohistorical. I advocate for a multiscalar model of listening that brings these traditions into closer dialogue, emphasizing how collaboration across methods can reveal the ideological conditions under which voices become audible, meaningful, and contested.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Linguistic Anthropology
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jola.70023
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Listening at different scales: Sociolinguistic perception and the listening subject

Anna‐Marie Sprenger
2 citations
Journal of Linguistic Anthropology
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
12.26
article

Listening at different scales: Sociolinguistic perception and the listening subject

Anna‐Marie Sprenger
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract This commentary argues that sociophonetic perception studies and linguistic anthropological analyses of the listening subject examine the same underlying process—ideologically structured listening—though at different observational scales. Drawing on Inoue's foundational work and subsequent research on enregisterment, mediatization, and indexical inversion, I show how experimental and ethnographic approaches each illuminate complementary dimensions of listening as both cognitive and sociohistorical. I advocate for a multiscalar model of listening that brings these traditions into closer dialogue, emphasizing how collaboration across methods can reveal the ideological conditions under which voices become audible, meaningful, and contested.

Journal of Linguistic AnthropologyVol. 35(3)
Center for Applied Linguistics (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US), University of Chicago (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
12.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Listening at different scales: Sociolinguistic perception and the listening subject — Anna‐Marie Sprenger · Journal of Linguistic Anthropology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS