A case study on forest practitioners’ perspectives on climate extremes: consensus on impacts and conflicts in responses

Climate extremes present significant challenges to the German forestry sector, impacting forest ecosystems, biodiversity, and overall forest health. This study examines the perspectives of forest practitioners regarding the impacts of climate extremes, such as drought, heat waves, storms, and heavy rainfall, as well as their proposed responses and potential conflicts. Utilizing a transdisciplinary approach, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 28 forest practitioners. The findings reveal that over 89% of practitioners acknowledge drought as the most significant climate extreme affecting forests, highlighting its detrimental impacts on tree health and forest ecosystems. Drought-related damage since 2018 has also resulted in significant economic losses and necessitates large-scale reforestation. Notably, two divergent management approaches were identified: those prioritizing wood production (FWP) tend to focus on economic viability and timber management strategies, while those emphasizing protection and recreation (FPR) concentrate on ecological sustainability and biodiversity conservation. There is a broad consensus on the impacts of climate change, but responses remain contested. Both groups agree on the importance of promoting mixed, multi-layered forest stands to enhance resilience to climate extremes. However, important differences remain: the FWP group advocates active interventions and favors conifer species such as spruce for economic reasons, while the FPR group emphasizes natural processes and prefers native species like beech. Although climate adaptation serves as a shared rationale, their underlying priorities differ considerably. These insights underscore the need for integrating diverse perspectives in forest management to effectively address the complexities of climate change, facilitating collaborative approaches that address both economic aspects and environmental co-benefits through integrated forest management.