Reproductive Equity Support: A Cross‐National Comparison of Medically Assisted Reproduction and Abortion Policies

This article offers a new way of classifying and measuring state support for reproductive equity across countries, focusing on medically assisted reproduction (MAR) and abortion. Drawing on the notion of stratified reproduction and comparative welfare state research, we propose a two‐dimensional framework to capture how policies can shape different sets of inequalities and how access to reproductive care is provided. The two dimensions that compose our framework are “permissiveness,” the degree to which government policies enable access to reproductive care by legalizing services, defining who qualifies as a patient, and/or imposing restrictive measures on service delivery, and “generosity,” the extent to which government policies subsidize the costs of authorized services for individuals deemed eligible. We applied the permissiveness–generosity framework to quantitative data on MAR and abortion policies from 2020 from the International Reproduction Policy Database across 30 high‐income countries. We then investigated the cases of Austria, Germany, and Switzerland, which group together in the overall plotting, more in‐depth. The quantitative mapping revealed diverse approaches to reproductive equity, with some countries having both permissive and generous policies, while others focus on one dimension or provide limited support altogether. The case studies show that despite overall trends towards greater reproductive equity in recent decades, state support for individuals’ equal access to MAR and abortion remains limited and has taken different pathways in this group of countries. This study contributes to a better understanding of how state policies promote equal access to reproductive care and enable individuals to pursue their desired reproductive pathways, regardless of their characteristics or socioeconomic position.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Inclusion
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17645/si.10548
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.70

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reproductive Equity Support: A Cross‐National Comparison of Medically Assisted Reproduction and Abortion Policies

Hannah Zagel, Mio Tamakoshi
1 citations
Social Inclusion
Reproductive Health and Technologies
1.70
article

Reproductive Equity Support: A Cross‐National Comparison of Medically Assisted Reproduction and Abortion Policies

Hannah Zagel, Mio Tamakoshi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article offers a new way of classifying and measuring state support for reproductive equity across countries, focusing on medically assisted reproduction (MAR) and abortion. Drawing on the notion of stratified reproduction and comparative welfare state research, we propose a two‐dimensional framework to capture how policies can shape different sets of inequalities and how access to reproductive care is provided. The two dimensions that compose our framework are “permissiveness,” the degree to which government policies enable access to reproductive care by legalizing services, defining who qualifies as a patient, and/or imposing restrictive measures on service delivery, and “generosity,” the extent to which government policies subsidize the costs of authorized services for individuals deemed eligible. We applied the permissiveness–generosity framework to quantitative data on MAR and abortion policies from 2020 from the International Reproduction Policy Database across 30 high‐income countries. We then investigated the cases of Austria, Germany, and Switzerland, which group together in the overall plotting, more in‐depth. The quantitative mapping revealed diverse approaches to reproductive equity, with some countries having both permissive and generous policies, while others focus on one dimension or provide limited support altogether. The case studies show that despite overall trends towards greater reproductive equity in recent decades, state support for individuals’ equal access to MAR and abortion remains limited and has taken different pathways in this group of countries. This study contributes to a better understanding of how state policies promote equal access to reproductive care and enable individuals to pursue their desired reproductive pathways, regardless of their characteristics or socioeconomic position.

Social InclusionVol. 13
TU Dortmund University (DE), WZB Berlin Social Science Center (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Reproductive Health and Technologies
1.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.