DIGITAL ETHICS OF RESPONSIBILITY IN THE WORKS OF L. FLORIDI

The article analyzes the transformation of the concept of responsibility in the digital age, particularly in the context of Luciano Floridi’s information ethics. Responsibility is examined as a key ethical category undergoing a profound shift under the influence of digital technologies. The authors emphasize that, in the digital era, responsibility should be understood not only as an individual moral choice but also as a collective obligation. Special attention is paid to the changing nature of ethical action in virtualized interactions, where classical notions of free will and moral autonomy are being revised. A central focus of the article is the concept of the “infosphere” – a global informational environment encompassing both digital and biosocial systems. Within this environment, responsibility emerges as a distributed and structural ethical function, shaped by a network of interactions between users, algorithms, and institutions. The article addresses key challenges related to the development of artificial intelligence, particularly the issue of the “responsibility gap” and the social risks associated with algorithmic decision-making. It explores the foundations of sociotechnical pragmatism as an alternative to both utopianism and skepticism in evaluating digital technologies. A critical review is conducted of the AI4People initiative, which seeks to formulate universal ethical principles for a digital society. The analysis highlights five core principles of digital ethics: beneficence, autonomy, justice, explicability, and non-maleficence. The study also examines the ethical implications of immersive digital environments (XR), which introduce new sensory and embodied dimensions of interaction. The article demonstrates that an ethical approach to digital reality must be interdisciplinary, reflexive, and oriented toward institutional responsibility. In this context, responsibility is interpreted as a multidimensional obligation encompassing technological, social, and normative aspects of interaction in a digitized world.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of V N Karazin Kharkiv National University Series Philosophy Philosophical Peripeteias
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26565/2226-0994-2025-72-11
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DIGITAL ETHICS OF RESPONSIBILITY IN THE WORKS OF L. FLORIDI

В. С. Кузнецов, Kateryna Kuznetsova
The Journal of V N Karazin Kharkiv National University Series Philosophy Philosophical Peripeteias
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

DIGITAL ETHICS OF RESPONSIBILITY IN THE WORKS OF L. FLORIDI

В. С. Кузнецов, Kateryna Kuznetsova
article en

Abstract

The article analyzes the transformation of the concept of responsibility in the digital age, particularly in the context of Luciano Floridi’s information ethics. Responsibility is examined as a key ethical category undergoing a profound shift under the influence of digital technologies. The authors emphasize that, in the digital era, responsibility should be understood not only as an individual moral choice but also as a collective obligation. Special attention is paid to the changing nature of ethical action in virtualized interactions, where classical notions of free will and moral autonomy are being revised. A central focus of the article is the concept of the “infosphere” – a global informational environment encompassing both digital and biosocial systems. Within this environment, responsibility emerges as a distributed and structural ethical function, shaped by a network of interactions between users, algorithms, and institutions. The article addresses key challenges related to the development of artificial intelligence, particularly the issue of the “responsibility gap” and the social risks associated with algorithmic decision-making. It explores the foundations of sociotechnical pragmatism as an alternative to both utopianism and skepticism in evaluating digital technologies. A critical review is conducted of the AI4People initiative, which seeks to formulate universal ethical principles for a digital society. The analysis highlights five core principles of digital ethics: beneficence, autonomy, justice, explicability, and non-maleficence. The study also examines the ethical implications of immersive digital environments (XR), which introduce new sensory and embodied dimensions of interaction. The article demonstrates that an ethical approach to digital reality must be interdisciplinary, reflexive, and oriented toward institutional responsibility. In this context, responsibility is interpreted as a multidimensional obligation encompassing technological, social, and normative aspects of interaction in a digitized world.

The Journal of V N Karazin Kharkiv National University Series Philosophy Philosophical Peripeteias(72)
Ivan Kozhedub Kharkiv National Air Force University (UA), Kharkiv University of Air Force (UA), V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University (UA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.