Assessing Carbon Emissions and Reduction Potential in Ecological and Concrete Slope Protection: Case of Huama Lake Project

This study aims to evaluate and compare the carbon emissions and reduction strategies of two different slope construction methods—concrete slope protection and ecological sprayed-soil slope protection—using a life-cycle assessment (LCA) approach. The research focuses on identifying key carbon emission sources throughout each stage of the construction, from material production to transportation, construction, and maintenance, with a particular emphasis on the ecological benefits of vegetation in reducing carbon footprints. Results indicate that the ecological slope protection scheme significantly outperforms the concrete scheme, reducing total carbon emissions by 667.21 tons. Furthermore, the ecological solution, due to its carbon sequestration capabilities, is projected to achieve carbon neutrality within 3.66 years after completion, offering a net carbon sequestration benefit of 2422.97 tons over its lifecycle. Optimization strategies across various stages—material production, transportation, construction, and maintenance—further reduce emissions by 56.8%, underscoring the potential for ecological slope protection to contribute to sustainable construction practices. This study not only provides valuable insights into low-carbon construction methods but also highlights the importance of integrating ecological and engineering technologies to meet global carbon reduction goals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app151810169
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.80
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Carbon Emissions and Reduction Potential in Ecological and Concrete Slope Protection: Case of Huama Lake Project

Kuei‐Hsien Liao, X D Liu, Jianjun Ye, Weisheng Xu et al.
1 citations
Applied Sciences
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
0.80
article

Assessing Carbon Emissions and Reduction Potential in Ecological and Concrete Slope Protection: Case of Huama Lake Project

Kuei‐Hsien Liao, X D Liu, Jianjun Ye, Weisheng Xu, Yujie Luo
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate and compare the carbon emissions and reduction strategies of two different slope construction methods—concrete slope protection and ecological sprayed-soil slope protection—using a life-cycle assessment (LCA) approach. The research focuses on identifying key carbon emission sources throughout each stage of the construction, from material production to transportation, construction, and maintenance, with a particular emphasis on the ecological benefits of vegetation in reducing carbon footprints. Results indicate that the ecological slope protection scheme significantly outperforms the concrete scheme, reducing total carbon emissions by 667.21 tons. Furthermore, the ecological solution, due to its carbon sequestration capabilities, is projected to achieve carbon neutrality within 3.66 years after completion, offering a net carbon sequestration benefit of 2422.97 tons over its lifecycle. Optimization strategies across various stages—material production, transportation, construction, and maintenance—further reduce emissions by 56.8%, underscoring the potential for ecological slope protection to contribute to sustainable construction practices. This study not only provides valuable insights into low-carbon construction methods but also highlights the importance of integrating ecological and engineering technologies to meet global carbon reduction goals.

Applied SciencesVol. 15(18)
Hubei University of Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
0.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.