Evaluating Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Capacity in Government Ministries and Agencies

Purpose: This research aims to evaluate the capacity development of Internal Control over Financial Reporting or Pengendalian Intern atas Pelaporan Keuangan (PIPK), within selected central government ministries and agencies (Kementerian/Lembaga, or K/L). The evaluation is conducted in response to recommendations from the Supreme Audit Agency (Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan, BPK) and findings from the Financial and Development Supervisory Agency (Badan Pengawasan Keuangan dan Pembangunan, BPKP), both of which emphasize the need to enhance the quality and effectiveness of PIPK implementation. Methodology/approach: Employing a qualitative case research design, the research adopts the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Capacity Assessment Framework as its analytical lens. The evaluation focuses on four critical dimensions of capacity—namely, institutional arrangements, leadership, knowledge, and accountability—across four selected ministries and agencies. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, questionnaires, and analysis of relevant documents Findings: The research identifies varying degrees of capacity gaps across the institutions. The most significant gap was found in the leadership dimension, while the accountability dimension exhibited the smallest gap. Key challenges include limited availability of qualified human resources, uneven knowledge management practices, and weak mechanisms for institutional documentation and evaluation. Practical implications: The findings offer valuable insights for policymakers and regulatory bodies to design more targeted capacity-building interventions. These include enhancing leadership engagement, implementing systematic knowledge management strategies, and reinforcing institutional structures to improve the overall effectiveness of PIPK in the public sector. Originality/value: This research represents one of the initial efforts to apply the UNDP Capacity Assessment Framework to the evaluation of PIPK implementation within Indonesian government institutions. It contributes to a deeper understanding of institutional capacity gaps and offers practical recommendations to enhance the reliability and accountability of public sector financial reporting.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Reviu Akuntansi dan Keuangan
Published
2025-08-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22219/jrak.v15i3.40763
Primary Topic
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Capacity in Government Ministries and Agencies

Viska Anggraita, Anas Isnaeni
Jurnal Reviu Akuntansi dan Keuangan
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
article

Evaluating Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Capacity in Government Ministries and Agencies

Viska Anggraita, Anas Isnaeni
article en

Abstract

Purpose: This research aims to evaluate the capacity development of Internal Control over Financial Reporting or Pengendalian Intern atas Pelaporan Keuangan (PIPK), within selected central government ministries and agencies (Kementerian/Lembaga, or K/L). The evaluation is conducted in response to recommendations from the Supreme Audit Agency (Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan, BPK) and findings from the Financial and Development Supervisory Agency (Badan Pengawasan Keuangan dan Pembangunan, BPKP), both of which emphasize the need to enhance the quality and effectiveness of PIPK implementation. Methodology/approach: Employing a qualitative case research design, the research adopts the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Capacity Assessment Framework as its analytical lens. The evaluation focuses on four critical dimensions of capacity—namely, institutional arrangements, leadership, knowledge, and accountability—across four selected ministries and agencies. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, questionnaires, and analysis of relevant documents Findings: The research identifies varying degrees of capacity gaps across the institutions. The most significant gap was found in the leadership dimension, while the accountability dimension exhibited the smallest gap. Key challenges include limited availability of qualified human resources, uneven knowledge management practices, and weak mechanisms for institutional documentation and evaluation. Practical implications: The findings offer valuable insights for policymakers and regulatory bodies to design more targeted capacity-building interventions. These include enhancing leadership engagement, implementing systematic knowledge management strategies, and reinforcing institutional structures to improve the overall effectiveness of PIPK in the public sector. Originality/value: This research represents one of the initial efforts to apply the UNDP Capacity Assessment Framework to the evaluation of PIPK implementation within Indonesian government institutions. It contributes to a deeper understanding of institutional capacity gaps and offers practical recommendations to enhance the reliability and accountability of public sector financial reporting.

Jurnal Reviu Akuntansi dan KeuanganVol. 15(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.