Assessment as a Site of Inclusion: A Qualitative Inquiry into Academic Faculty Perspectives

This qualitative study investigates how academic faculty in a UK university conceptualise and implement alternative assessment practices aimed at fostering critical 21st-century skills—such as problem-solving, collaboration, and creativity—in an increasingly diverse higher education context. Drawing on in-depth interviews with six academic faculty members, the study explores the extent to which inclusive and alternative assessment practices are embedded in teaching and examines the institutional and cultural barriers that shape these practices. Thematic analysis reveals that while staff broadly value critical skills, there is considerable variation in how these skills are understood and operationalised in assessment. Many staff face structural constraints, including rigid assessment policies and market-driven accountability frameworks, that limit their ability to innovate. Furthermore, the findings highlight a disjunction between staff awareness of inclusive pedagogies and their capacity to enact them systematically in assessment design. The study contributes to the literature by foregrounding the complex interplay between institutional logics, assessment practices, and inclusive pedagogical aims. It argues that advancing genuinely inclusive and skills-oriented assessment requires systemic change at both institutional and policy levels.