Predicting photosynthesis–irradiance relationships from satellite remote‐sensing observations

Abstract Photosynthesis–irradiance (PI) relationships are important for phytoplankton ecology and quantifying carbon fixation rates in the environment. However, the parameters of PI relationships are typically unknown across space and time. Here we use machine learning, satellite remote‐sensing, and a database of in situ PI relationships to build models that predict the seasonal cycle of PI parameters as a function of satellite‐observed variables. Using only surface light, temperature, and chlorophyll, we achieve an R 2 of 58% for predicting photosynthesis rates at saturating light () and an R 2 of 78% for predicting the light saturation parameter (). Predictability is maximized when averaging environmental covariates over 30‐d () and 25‐d () timescales, indicating that environmental history and community turnover timescales are important for predicting in situ PI relationships. These results will help improve the parameterization of satellite‐based primary production models and quantify emergent environmental integration timescales in photosynthetic communities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Limnology and Oceanography Letters
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/lol2.70062
Primary Topic
Marine and coastal ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting photosynthesis–irradiance relationships from satellite remote‐sensing observations

Heather A. Bouman, Bror Jönsson, Shubha Sathyendranath, Gemma Kulk et al.
Limnology and Oceanography Letters
Marine and coastal ecosystems
article

Predicting photosynthesis–irradiance relationships from satellite remote‐sensing observations

Heather A. Bouman, Bror Jönsson, Shubha Sathyendranath, Gemma Kulk, Michael J. Follows, Gregory L. Britten
article en

Abstract

Abstract Photosynthesis–irradiance (PI) relationships are important for phytoplankton ecology and quantifying carbon fixation rates in the environment. However, the parameters of PI relationships are typically unknown across space and time. Here we use machine learning, satellite remote‐sensing, and a database of in situ PI relationships to build models that predict the seasonal cycle of PI parameters as a function of satellite‐observed variables. Using only surface light, temperature, and chlorophyll, we achieve an R 2 of 58% for predicting photosynthesis rates at saturating light () and an R 2 of 78% for predicting the light saturation parameter (). Predictability is maximized when averaging environmental covariates over 30‐d () and 25‐d () timescales, indicating that environmental history and community turnover timescales are important for predicting in situ PI relationships. These results will help improve the parameterization of satellite‐based primary production models and quantify emergent environmental integration timescales in photosynthetic communities.

Limnology and Oceanography LettersVol. 10(6)
Plymouth Marine Laboratory (GB), University of Oxford (GB), National Centre for Earth Observation (GB), PML Applications (United Kingdom) (GB), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US), Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Marine and coastal ecosystems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.