China’s Strategic Threat Narratives: An Ideationalist Critical Security Perspective on the Russian–Ukraine War

This article examines China’s political discourse on the Russian invasion of Ukraine from February 2022 to March 2023 through an ideationalist security framework. Using securitization theory and discourse analysis, we analyzed 117 official Chinese statements. We find that China supports Russia’s securitization narrative while aligning with Western ideas when strategically beneficial. Using concepts like “Limitless Partnership” and “UN Principles,” China portrays itself as neutral while actively reshaping narratives about the global order. This dual strategy reveals China’s ideational power to reinterpret established norms, challenge its image as a desecuritizing actor, and inform debates on its international security role.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Asian and African Studies
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00219096251369525
Primary Topic
Global Security and Public Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

China’s Strategic Threat Narratives: An Ideationalist Critical Security Perspective on the Russian–Ukraine War

Christian Kaunert, Stefanie Weil, Aktoty Aitzhanova
Journal of Asian and African Studies
Global Security and Public Health
article

China’s Strategic Threat Narratives: An Ideationalist Critical Security Perspective on the Russian–Ukraine War

Christian Kaunert, Stefanie Weil, Aktoty Aitzhanova
article en

Abstract

This article examines China’s political discourse on the Russian invasion of Ukraine from February 2022 to March 2023 through an ideationalist security framework. Using securitization theory and discourse analysis, we analyzed 117 official Chinese statements. We find that China supports Russia’s securitization narrative while aligning with Western ideas when strategically beneficial. Using concepts like “Limitless Partnership” and “UN Principles,” China portrays itself as neutral while actively reshaping narratives about the global order. This dual strategy reveals China’s ideational power to reinterpret established norms, challenge its image as a desecuritizing actor, and inform debates on its international security role.

Journal of Asian and African Studies
University of Antwerp (BE), Antwerp Management School (BE), Dublin City University (IE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Global Security and Public Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.