Comparison of Three Anonymization Tools for a Health Fitness Study
One of many challenges to open science is anonymization of personal data so that it may be shared. This paper presents a case study of the anonymization of a dataset containing cardio-respiratory fitness and commuting patterns for Slovenian school children. It evaluates three different anonymization tools, ARX, SDV, and SynDiffix. The fitness study was selected because its small size (N=713) and generally low statistical significance make it particularly challenging for data anonymization. Unlike most prior anonymization tool evaluations, this paper examines whether the scientific conclusions of the original study would have been supported by the anonymized datasets. It also considers the burden imposed on researchers using the tools both for data generation and data analysis.
Authors
- Gregor Jurak (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4269-0970)
- Fabian Praßer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3172-3095)
- Karen Otte (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3518-5274)
- Paul Francis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1574-887X)
- Bojan Leskošek
Institutions
- University of Kaiserslautern (DE)
- University of Ljubljana (SI)
- Max Planck Institute for Software Systems (DE)
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Scientific Data
- Published
- 2025-09-18
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-025-05823-x
- Primary Topic
- Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00