Comparison of Three Anonymization Tools for a Health Fitness Study

One of many challenges to open science is anonymization of personal data so that it may be shared. This paper presents a case study of the anonymization of a dataset containing cardio-respiratory fitness and commuting patterns for Slovenian school children. It evaluates three different anonymization tools, ARX, SDV, and SynDiffix. The fitness study was selected because its small size (N=713) and generally low statistical significance make it particularly challenging for data anonymization. Unlike most prior anonymization tool evaluations, this paper examines whether the scientific conclusions of the original study would have been supported by the anonymized datasets. It also considers the burden imposed on researchers using the tools both for data generation and data analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Data
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-025-05823-x
Primary Topic
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Three Anonymization Tools for a Health Fitness Study

Gregor Jurak, Fabian Praßer, Karen Otte, Paul Francis et al.
Scientific Data
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
article

Comparison of Three Anonymization Tools for a Health Fitness Study

Gregor Jurak, Fabian Praßer, Karen Otte, Paul Francis, Bojan Leskošek
article en

Abstract

One of many challenges to open science is anonymization of personal data so that it may be shared. This paper presents a case study of the anonymization of a dataset containing cardio-respiratory fitness and commuting patterns for Slovenian school children. It evaluates three different anonymization tools, ARX, SDV, and SynDiffix. The fitness study was selected because its small size (N=713) and generally low statistical significance make it particularly challenging for data anonymization. Unlike most prior anonymization tool evaluations, this paper examines whether the scientific conclusions of the original study would have been supported by the anonymized datasets. It also considers the burden imposed on researchers using the tools both for data generation and data analysis.

Scientific DataVol. 12(1)
University of Kaiserslautern (DE), University of Ljubljana (SI), Max Planck Institute for Software Systems (DE), Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison of Three Anonymization Tools for a Health Fitness Study — Gregor Jurak, Fabian Praßer, et al. · Scientific Data (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS