A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TREE-BASED ENSEMBLES AND DEEP LEARNING FOR EQUITY PRICE FORECASTING USING FEATURE-ENGINEERED ADVANCE TECHNICAL INDICATORS

Technical indicators are widely used by researchers and investors to predict the stock market. Finding the ideal quantity of technical indicators to use is essential for making accurate stock market predictions. In order to forecast short-term stock price fluctuations, this study methodically assesses the combination of sophisticated technical indicators and cutting-edge machine learning algorithms. The study developed a strong set of features, such as volatility-normalized Average True Range, RSI derivatives, VWAP-based measures, and Hull Moving Average, to be used as inputs for several models using 10 years of data (2014–2024) from ten randomly chosen NIFTY 50 stocks. To ensure economically significant signals, a binary classification target was established to forecast if the five-day ahead return will above a volatility-dependent threshold. Using a temporal train-validation-test split to ensure out-of-sample robustness and prevent look-ahead bias, the experiment contrasted a deep learning LSTM network, tree-based models (Random Forest and XGBoost), and a baseline dummy classifier. With the lowest maximum drawdown across stocks and the greatest average Sharpe ratio (1.72), the results showed that XGBoost performed noticeably better than any other model. It was especially successful because of its consistency and capacity to identify intricate, non-linear relationships in the feature-engineered tabular data. Despite being competitive in some situations, the LSTM performed worse overall and had larger variation, most likely as a result of the small dataset size and the natural benefit of using tree-based techniques with structured financial data. According to the study's findings, technically derived features have a great deal of predictive power, but their effectiveness is enhanced when they are processed using potent ensemble techniques like XGBoost, which provide better performance and robustness for real-world trading applications than more intricate deep learning techniques.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Apllied Mathematics
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12732/ijam.v38i2s.124
Primary Topic
Stock Market Forecasting Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TREE-BASED ENSEMBLES AND DEEP LEARNING FOR EQUITY PRICE FORECASTING USING FEATURE-ENGINEERED ADVANCE TECHNICAL INDICATORS

Satya Prakash Singh
International Journal of Apllied Mathematics
Stock Market Forecasting Methods
article

A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TREE-BASED ENSEMBLES AND DEEP LEARNING FOR EQUITY PRICE FORECASTING USING FEATURE-ENGINEERED ADVANCE TECHNICAL INDICATORS

Satya Prakash Singh
article en

Abstract

Technical indicators are widely used by researchers and investors to predict the stock market. Finding the ideal quantity of technical indicators to use is essential for making accurate stock market predictions. In order to forecast short-term stock price fluctuations, this study methodically assesses the combination of sophisticated technical indicators and cutting-edge machine learning algorithms. The study developed a strong set of features, such as volatility-normalized Average True Range, RSI derivatives, VWAP-based measures, and Hull Moving Average, to be used as inputs for several models using 10 years of data (2014–2024) from ten randomly chosen NIFTY 50 stocks. To ensure economically significant signals, a binary classification target was established to forecast if the five-day ahead return will above a volatility-dependent threshold. Using a temporal train-validation-test split to ensure out-of-sample robustness and prevent look-ahead bias, the experiment contrasted a deep learning LSTM network, tree-based models (Random Forest and XGBoost), and a baseline dummy classifier. With the lowest maximum drawdown across stocks and the greatest average Sharpe ratio (1.72), the results showed that XGBoost performed noticeably better than any other model. It was especially successful because of its consistency and capacity to identify intricate, non-linear relationships in the feature-engineered tabular data. Despite being competitive in some situations, the LSTM performed worse overall and had larger variation, most likely as a result of the small dataset size and the natural benefit of using tree-based techniques with structured financial data. According to the study's findings, technically derived features have a great deal of predictive power, but their effectiveness is enhanced when they are processed using potent ensemble techniques like XGBoost, which provide better performance and robustness for real-world trading applications than more intricate deep learning techniques.

International Journal of Apllied MathematicsVol. 38(2s)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Stock Market Forecasting Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TREE-BASED ENSEMBLES AND DEEP LEARNING FOR EQUITY PRICE FORECASTING USING FEATURE-ENGINEERED ADVANCE TECHNICAL INDICATORS — Satya Prakash Singh · International Journal of Apllied Mathematics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS