Evaluating Compliance to Intra-operative Syndesmosis Stress Testing During Ankle Fracture Fixation: Are We Stressing It?

Introduction Ankle fractures are common injuries, and a proportion are complicated by syndesmotic instability. If left unrecognised or untreated, such instability can lead to poor functional outcomes, chronic pain and long-term joint degeneration. Intra-operative stress testing plays a vital role in detecting these injuries, and both radiographic evidence and clear documentation are key to ensuring safe and transparent surgical practice. Methods We conducted a retrospective closed-loop audit at a district general hospital to evaluate compliance documentation for intra-operative syndesmosis stress testing during ankle fracture fixation. Target compliance was set at 80% for both radiographic evidence saved and documentation in operative notes. The first audit cycle (November 2023-April 2024) identified gaps in practice and was followed by targeted educational interventions, including posters and dedicated teaching sessions. A second audit cycle was then performed (April-July 2025). Statistical comparison between the two cycles was performed using the Chi-squared test. Results Eighty-nine patient records were included in the first cycle and 50 in the second. Initial compliance for radiological evidence saved was 55% (n=49), and documentation was 71% (n=63). After intervention, both domains improved to 82% (n=41), achieving the audit target. The increase in radiological evidence saved was statistically significant (p=0.001), while the improvement in documentation was not (p=0.14). Importantly, the proportion of cases with no evidence saved fell from 25% (n=22) to 6% (n=3). Conclusion Targeted, low-cost interventions significantly improved compliance with British Orthopaedic Association Standard for Trauma (BOAST) standards for intra-operative syndesmosis testing. Embedding systematic stress testing, radiographic archiving and operative note documentation into routine practice enhances patient safety, reduces medico-legal risk and supports long-term ankle stability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.92617
Primary Topic
Foot and Ankle Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Compliance to Intra-operative Syndesmosis Stress Testing During Ankle Fracture Fixation: Are We Stressing It?

Abdullah Khan Durrani, A. Sangar, Hassan Imtiaz, Georgios Kouklidis et al.
Cureus
Foot and Ankle Surgery
article

Evaluating Compliance to Intra-operative Syndesmosis Stress Testing During Ankle Fracture Fixation: Are We Stressing It?

Abdullah Khan Durrani, A. Sangar, Hassan Imtiaz, Georgios Kouklidis, A. Z. M. Rezaul Karim, Adam Khan Rahim, Thet Paing Oo, Kunjan Barot
article en

Abstract

Introduction Ankle fractures are common injuries, and a proportion are complicated by syndesmotic instability. If left unrecognised or untreated, such instability can lead to poor functional outcomes, chronic pain and long-term joint degeneration. Intra-operative stress testing plays a vital role in detecting these injuries, and both radiographic evidence and clear documentation are key to ensuring safe and transparent surgical practice. Methods We conducted a retrospective closed-loop audit at a district general hospital to evaluate compliance documentation for intra-operative syndesmosis stress testing during ankle fracture fixation. Target compliance was set at 80% for both radiographic evidence saved and documentation in operative notes. The first audit cycle (November 2023-April 2024) identified gaps in practice and was followed by targeted educational interventions, including posters and dedicated teaching sessions. A second audit cycle was then performed (April-July 2025). Statistical comparison between the two cycles was performed using the Chi-squared test. Results Eighty-nine patient records were included in the first cycle and 50 in the second. Initial compliance for radiological evidence saved was 55% (n=49), and documentation was 71% (n=63). After intervention, both domains improved to 82% (n=41), achieving the audit target. The increase in radiological evidence saved was statistically significant (p=0.001), while the improvement in documentation was not (p=0.14). Importantly, the proportion of cases with no evidence saved fell from 25% (n=22) to 6% (n=3). Conclusion Targeted, low-cost interventions significantly improved compliance with British Orthopaedic Association Standard for Trauma (BOAST) standards for intra-operative syndesmosis testing. Embedding systematic stress testing, radiographic archiving and operative note documentation into routine practice enhances patient safety, reduces medico-legal risk and supports long-term ankle stability.

CureusVol. 17(9)
Poole Hospital (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Foot and Ankle Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.