A multi-layered evaluation of university-wide education interventions to improve student engagement and retention

The strategic benefit of student retention is financial for institutions, economic for states and personal for individual students. Nonetheless, enacting and evaluating effective innovations to improve retention is challenging. This paper reports a multi-layered set of methods combining a quasi-experimental design, statistical methods with a dynamic learning analytic approach based upon baseline of data, multiple data sets and mixed methods (quantitative and qualitative) to explore how student engagement, progression and retention were affected by learning interventions of different varieties deployed across a university. With a cross-university team including executive and faculty leadership, our strategy-guided intervention reached 65% of the university’s first-year students (with 2,990 students from 36 modules/units, and 24 disciplines, involved in the study). Our main findings show that the most benefit in retention was gained by the use of supplemental instruction, which coincided with increased satisfaction of students’ psychological needs as a proxy measure of engagement. Cost-benefit modelling indicated that our strategic interventions also led to substantial revenue gains. This paper provides a framework for higher educational institutions to evaluate similar programmes and demonstrates the efficacy of the programme that we assessed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Further and Higher Education
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877x.2025.2560999
Primary Topic
Higher Education Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A multi-layered evaluation of university-wide education interventions to improve student engagement and retention

Stephen M. Ritchie, Guy J. Curtis, Sara de Freitas
Journal of Further and Higher Education
Higher Education Research Studies
article

A multi-layered evaluation of university-wide education interventions to improve student engagement and retention

Stephen M. Ritchie, Guy J. Curtis, Sara de Freitas
article en

Abstract

The strategic benefit of student retention is financial for institutions, economic for states and personal for individual students. Nonetheless, enacting and evaluating effective innovations to improve retention is challenging. This paper reports a multi-layered set of methods combining a quasi-experimental design, statistical methods with a dynamic learning analytic approach based upon baseline of data, multiple data sets and mixed methods (quantitative and qualitative) to explore how student engagement, progression and retention were affected by learning interventions of different varieties deployed across a university. With a cross-university team including executive and faculty leadership, our strategy-guided intervention reached 65% of the university’s first-year students (with 2,990 students from 36 modules/units, and 24 disciplines, involved in the study). Our main findings show that the most benefit in retention was gained by the use of supplemental instruction, which coincided with increased satisfaction of students’ psychological needs as a proxy measure of engagement. Cost-benefit modelling indicated that our strategic interventions also led to substantial revenue gains. This paper provides a framework for higher educational institutions to evaluate similar programmes and demonstrates the efficacy of the programme that we assessed.

Journal of Further and Higher EducationVol. 49(10)
University of Suffolk (GB), Murdoch University (AU), The University of Western Australia (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Higher Education Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.