Optimising extended reality training: a Bayesian network approach to predicting learning and transfer outcomes

Abstract The present work sought to develop a deeper understanding of the complex interactions between features of extended reality (XR) training interventions and successful training outcomes using a Bayesian Network (BN) model. We extracted data from 41 previous independent-group XR training studies, focusing on technology features (e.g., body visualization, visual fidelity, haptic feedback, personalization) and training design elements (e.g., continuous challenge, explicit feedback, training duration). We sought to elucidate the causal relationships between these variables to predict training success (both learning of the training task and transfer to new contexts) in sensorimotor tasks. The structure of our BN model was informed by expert knowledge, prior literature, and causal reasoning. The joint probability distribution over the model was then learned from the data extracted from previous studies. The model’s performance was examined using cross-fold validation, yielding high precision (85%) and accuracy (76%). Performing probabilistic inference on the final model revealed that haptic feedback and body visualization provided little benefit for learning of the training task, but did improve transfer of training. Meanwhile, continuous challenge emerged as the most influential training design feature for increasing the probability of transfer. Overall, the technology and training design features that were beneficial for transfer were often not beneficial for task learning, highlighting a critical distinction between short-term performance gains and the long-term retention and adaptability of skills. These findings contribute to a comprehensive understanding of how specific technology and training design features influence XR training success, paving the way for new theoretically-grounded applications of immersive technology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Virtual Reality
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-025-01217-x
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimising extended reality training: a Bayesian network approach to predicting learning and transfer outcomes

Samuel J. Vine, David Harris, Tom Arthur, Samuel Bateman
2 citations
Virtual Reality
Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
2.72
article

Optimising extended reality training: a Bayesian network approach to predicting learning and transfer outcomes

Samuel J. Vine, David Harris, Tom Arthur, Samuel Bateman
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract The present work sought to develop a deeper understanding of the complex interactions between features of extended reality (XR) training interventions and successful training outcomes using a Bayesian Network (BN) model. We extracted data from 41 previous independent-group XR training studies, focusing on technology features (e.g., body visualization, visual fidelity, haptic feedback, personalization) and training design elements (e.g., continuous challenge, explicit feedback, training duration). We sought to elucidate the causal relationships between these variables to predict training success (both learning of the training task and transfer to new contexts) in sensorimotor tasks. The structure of our BN model was informed by expert knowledge, prior literature, and causal reasoning. The joint probability distribution over the model was then learned from the data extracted from previous studies. The model’s performance was examined using cross-fold validation, yielding high precision (85%) and accuracy (76%). Performing probabilistic inference on the final model revealed that haptic feedback and body visualization provided little benefit for learning of the training task, but did improve transfer of training. Meanwhile, continuous challenge emerged as the most influential training design feature for increasing the probability of transfer. Overall, the technology and training design features that were beneficial for transfer were often not beneficial for task learning, highlighting a critical distinction between short-term performance gains and the long-term retention and adaptability of skills. These findings contribute to a comprehensive understanding of how specific technology and training design features influence XR training success, paving the way for new theoretically-grounded applications of immersive technology.

Virtual RealityVol. 29(4)
University of Exeter (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
2.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.