Hydrodynamics of gas–liquid–solid three phase systems in ebullated beds and fluidized beds using computational fluid dynamics

The hydrodynamics of the three-phase system in an ebullated bed reactor (EBR) is investigated using computational fluid dynamics and compared with that in a fluidized bed reactor (FBR). For consistency in the comparison, the two reactors have the same dimensions (2.20 m length and 0.172 m diameter), except that there is no recirculation column in the FBR, and the same superficial velocities of liquid phase (0.057 and 0.095 m/s) and gas phase (0.04, 0.08, 0.12 m/s), particle diameter (300 μm), initial solids volume fraction of the bed (0.5), and initial packing height (0.3 m). It is found that the expansion of the bed is greater in the EBR than in the FBR under identical conditions of low liquid superficial velocity. In the FBR, the larger size of the voids formed in the expanded region causes decreased interactions between the three phases, whereas in the EBR, smaller voids are formed at lower simulation times, whereas slugs are formed at longer times. In addition, early stability of bed expansion is attained at lower gas superficial velocities, irrespective of the value of the liquid superficial velocity. In the EBR, there is no symmetry of bed expansion on each side of the recirculation pipe even at low liquid superficial velocities. It is found that at 0.5 m bed height, the radial distributions of gas, liquid, and solids indicate a more uniform and better distribution of the three phases in the EBR. The local solids fraction distribution along the radial position indicates that in the EBR, for most of combinations of gas and liquid superficial velocities, the solids fraction is properly distributed and that it is even more uniform for the combination of a higher liquid and lower gas superficial velocity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Fluid Engineering
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0260438
Primary Topic
Granular flow and fluidized beds
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hydrodynamics of gas–liquid–solid three phase systems in ebullated beds and fluidized beds using computational fluid dynamics

Nanda Kishore, Desta Sodano Sheiso
International Journal of Fluid Engineering
Granular flow and fluidized beds
article

Hydrodynamics of gas–liquid–solid three phase systems in ebullated beds and fluidized beds using computational fluid dynamics

Nanda Kishore, Desta Sodano Sheiso
article en

Abstract

The hydrodynamics of the three-phase system in an ebullated bed reactor (EBR) is investigated using computational fluid dynamics and compared with that in a fluidized bed reactor (FBR). For consistency in the comparison, the two reactors have the same dimensions (2.20 m length and 0.172 m diameter), except that there is no recirculation column in the FBR, and the same superficial velocities of liquid phase (0.057 and 0.095 m/s) and gas phase (0.04, 0.08, 0.12 m/s), particle diameter (300 μm), initial solids volume fraction of the bed (0.5), and initial packing height (0.3 m). It is found that the expansion of the bed is greater in the EBR than in the FBR under identical conditions of low liquid superficial velocity. In the FBR, the larger size of the voids formed in the expanded region causes decreased interactions between the three phases, whereas in the EBR, smaller voids are formed at lower simulation times, whereas slugs are formed at longer times. In addition, early stability of bed expansion is attained at lower gas superficial velocities, irrespective of the value of the liquid superficial velocity. In the EBR, there is no symmetry of bed expansion on each side of the recirculation pipe even at low liquid superficial velocities. It is found that at 0.5 m bed height, the radial distributions of gas, liquid, and solids indicate a more uniform and better distribution of the three phases in the EBR. The local solids fraction distribution along the radial position indicates that in the EBR, for most of combinations of gas and liquid superficial velocities, the solids fraction is properly distributed and that it is even more uniform for the combination of a higher liquid and lower gas superficial velocity.

International Journal of Fluid EngineeringVol. 3(1)
Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati (IN), Indian Institute of Information Technology Guwahati (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Granular flow and fluidized beds
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Hydrodynamics of gas–liquid–solid three phase systems in ebullated beds and fluidized beds using computational fluid dynamics — Nanda Kishore, Desta Sodano Sheiso · International Journal of Fluid Engineering (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS