Ready, Willing, and Able? Challenges Facing the Governance of Generative AI in the UK’s Legal Services Sector

In light of the increasing prominence of generative AI, this paper examines a number of critical challenges facing the stratified policy and governance frameworks shaping the adoption of this technology in the legal services sector. We argue that there are counterproductive tensions within the existing policy and governance framework, and that if we are to make the UK legal sector ‘ready, willing, and able’ to harness the potential of artificial intelligence, it is imperative that we set in place a new governance framework that is capable of setting, promoting, and supporting innovation across the legal sector as a whole. Furthermore, within this policy and governance framework we consider two critical factors that are relevant to state-of-the-art AI systems which present critical challenges to the development of legal AI: (1) data access issues in the domain of law and (2) knowledge, skills, and awareness of capabilities relating to the application of generative AI to legal problems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SCRIPTed A Journal of Law Technology & Society
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2218/scrip.22.1.2025.11649
Primary Topic
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ready, Willing, and Able? Challenges Facing the Governance of Generative AI in the UK’s Legal Services Sector

John K. Marshall, Katie Atkinson, David Bareham
SCRIPTed A Journal of Law Technology & Society
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
article

Ready, Willing, and Able? Challenges Facing the Governance of Generative AI in the UK’s Legal Services Sector

John K. Marshall, Katie Atkinson, David Bareham
article en

Abstract

In light of the increasing prominence of generative AI, this paper examines a number of critical challenges facing the stratified policy and governance frameworks shaping the adoption of this technology in the legal services sector. We argue that there are counterproductive tensions within the existing policy and governance framework, and that if we are to make the UK legal sector ‘ready, willing, and able’ to harness the potential of artificial intelligence, it is imperative that we set in place a new governance framework that is capable of setting, promoting, and supporting innovation across the legal sector as a whole. Furthermore, within this policy and governance framework we consider two critical factors that are relevant to state-of-the-art AI systems which present critical challenges to the development of legal AI: (1) data access issues in the domain of law and (2) knowledge, skills, and awareness of capabilities relating to the application of generative AI to legal problems.

SCRIPTed A Journal of Law Technology & SocietyVol. 22(1)
University of Liverpool (GB)
Economic and Social Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.