Standardization of sociological tests in the context of measurement problem in sociology

The article is devoted to the analysis of a number of problems associated with the use of a specific method of obtaining sociological information - a sociological test. An overview of scientific approaches to understanding the concept of "sociological test" is presented, some related concepts are clarified (in particular, "test", "norm", "normative scale"), procedural aspects related to the development of sociological tests, methods for ensuring their diagnostic capacity are considered. Particular attention is paid to the issues of standardization of sociological tests, since this procedure, firstly, unifies the testing process and ensures objectivity and reproducibility, and, secondly, is an important prerequisite for checking a sociological test for reliability, validity and invariance, which generally determine the quality of this measuring tool. It is noted that, unlike psychological science, where standardization has become an integral part of research practice, sociological questionnaires are often developed without comprehensive verification of the internal structure, which leads to significant variability in the results obtained and complicates the comparison of data from different research centers. In the absence of tools, sociological research risks becoming fragmentary and unsuitable for the comparison procedure, which, in turn, limits the possibility of forming cumulative sociological knowledge, applying the obtained data in interdisciplinary and international comparative studies. These problems are particularly acute in the measurement of multidimensional and context-dependent social constructs (social trust, civic engagement, social status, etc.). The article also outlines a number of methodological guidelines for the practical implementation of the procedure for standardization of sociological tests, in particular, two aspects of standardization and its general procedure, the process and procedure for scale normalization, etc. are characterized. The article also outlines a number of methodological guidelines for the practical implementation of the procedure for standardizing sociological tests; in particular, it describes two aspects of standardization and its general procedure, the process and procedure for normalizing the scale, etc.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Visnyk V N Karazin Kharkiv National University Series Sociological studies of contemporary society methodology theory methods
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26565/2227-6521-2025-54-01
Primary Topic
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Standardization of sociological tests in the context of measurement problem in sociology

Olga Kyslova, A. M. Nikolaievska
Visnyk V N Karazin Kharkiv National University Series Sociological studies of contemporary society methodology theory methods
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
article

Standardization of sociological tests in the context of measurement problem in sociology

Olga Kyslova, A. M. Nikolaievska
article en

Abstract

The article is devoted to the analysis of a number of problems associated with the use of a specific method of obtaining sociological information - a sociological test. An overview of scientific approaches to understanding the concept of "sociological test" is presented, some related concepts are clarified (in particular, "test", "norm", "normative scale"), procedural aspects related to the development of sociological tests, methods for ensuring their diagnostic capacity are considered. Particular attention is paid to the issues of standardization of sociological tests, since this procedure, firstly, unifies the testing process and ensures objectivity and reproducibility, and, secondly, is an important prerequisite for checking a sociological test for reliability, validity and invariance, which generally determine the quality of this measuring tool. It is noted that, unlike psychological science, where standardization has become an integral part of research practice, sociological questionnaires are often developed without comprehensive verification of the internal structure, which leads to significant variability in the results obtained and complicates the comparison of data from different research centers. In the absence of tools, sociological research risks becoming fragmentary and unsuitable for the comparison procedure, which, in turn, limits the possibility of forming cumulative sociological knowledge, applying the obtained data in interdisciplinary and international comparative studies. These problems are particularly acute in the measurement of multidimensional and context-dependent social constructs (social trust, civic engagement, social status, etc.). The article also outlines a number of methodological guidelines for the practical implementation of the procedure for standardization of sociological tests, in particular, two aspects of standardization and its general procedure, the process and procedure for scale normalization, etc. are characterized. The article also outlines a number of methodological guidelines for the practical implementation of the procedure for standardizing sociological tests; in particular, it describes two aspects of standardization and its general procedure, the process and procedure for normalizing the scale, etc.

Visnyk V N Karazin Kharkiv National University Series Sociological studies of contemporary society methodology theory methods(54)
V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University (UA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.