Countering anti-forensic tactics in cybercrime investigations – a systematic literature review

Abstract With the increasing use of digital technology, people are relying on digital data for various tasks. However, this reliance has led to a rise in cyberattacks. To combat these threats, digital forensic departments are tasked with investigating such incidents. Yet, attackers continuously develop new methods to conceal their actions. These actions are considered anti-forensics, where attackers try to hamper the digital forensic investigation process by manipulating or deleting evidence to hide their tracks of malicious activities or to mislead the forensic process. Therefore, implementing effective countermeasures is essential to stop these attackers. This has resulted in a systematic review of existing literature in this domain to comprehensively understand anti-forensic techniques, evaluate current countermeasures, and identify areas for further research and development. This paper aimed to provide an overview of the anti-forensic tactics in cybercrime investigations along with their corresponding countermeasures. Digital forensics experts face many challenges in their investigations as sophisticated cyber criminals hide their tracks. The limitations of current digital forensics techniques and tools were explored, and improvements and countermeasures were suggested. Our paper aims to enhance the understanding of the digital forensics field and its associated challenges. The findings of this research are valuable as they identify key gaps in current cybersecurity practices, and these have been highlighted in the knowledge gap section.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Information Security
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10207-025-01131-y
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Digital and Cyber Forensics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.25

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Countering anti-forensic tactics in cybercrime investigations – a systematic literature review

Sam Goundar, Joshua Dwight, Sonu Surakanti
1 citations
International Journal of Information Security
Digital and Cyber Forensics
3.25
article

Countering anti-forensic tactics in cybercrime investigations – a systematic literature review

Sam Goundar, Joshua Dwight, Sonu Surakanti
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract With the increasing use of digital technology, people are relying on digital data for various tasks. However, this reliance has led to a rise in cyberattacks. To combat these threats, digital forensic departments are tasked with investigating such incidents. Yet, attackers continuously develop new methods to conceal their actions. These actions are considered anti-forensics, where attackers try to hamper the digital forensic investigation process by manipulating or deleting evidence to hide their tracks of malicious activities or to mislead the forensic process. Therefore, implementing effective countermeasures is essential to stop these attackers. This has resulted in a systematic review of existing literature in this domain to comprehensively understand anti-forensic techniques, evaluate current countermeasures, and identify areas for further research and development. This paper aimed to provide an overview of the anti-forensic tactics in cybercrime investigations along with their corresponding countermeasures. Digital forensics experts face many challenges in their investigations as sophisticated cyber criminals hide their tracks. The limitations of current digital forensics techniques and tools were explored, and improvements and countermeasures were suggested. Our paper aims to enhance the understanding of the digital forensics field and its associated challenges. The findings of this research are valuable as they identify key gaps in current cybersecurity practices, and these have been highlighted in the knowledge gap section.

International Journal of Information SecurityVol. 24(5)
RMIT Vietnam (VN)
RMIT University
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Digital and Cyber Forensics
3.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.