Exploring communication preferences for disclosing breast cancer risk in women with a family history

Effective breast cancer (BC) screening relies on shared decision-making and clear communication to help patients understand their risk and choose strategies aligned with that risk. The CanRisk tool was used to estimate BC risk in healthy women with a familial history of BC and the absence of a pathogenic variant in BC genes. Results were disclosed to patients using different formats, and data were collected to analyze the association between patient characteristics and risk communication preferences. Participants preferred their risk explained by percentages (59%) over fractions (15%), icon arrays (13%) or risk groups (13%) and 10-year risk estimation was favored to remaining lifetime risk (71% vs. 22%). Participants highlighted the use of positive and negative formats and comparison with the population's risk formats, and line graphic (61%) was selected over numerical table or a color-graph (19% each). However, participants with lower numeracy preferred color graphics (OR: 1.42; 95% CI 1.15-1.77 p = 0.001). The use of percentages, line graphics, and 10-year risk formats are highly accepted for healthy participants with a family history of BC, although adaptation may be needed for those with lower numeracy skills.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Genetic Counseling
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.70114
Citations
1
Primary Topic
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring communication preferences for disclosing breast cancer risk in women with a family history

Teresa Ramón y Cajal, Víctor Navarro Garcés, Adrià López‐Fernández, Mònica Pardo et al.
1 citations
Journal of Genetic Counseling
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
1.82
article

Exploring communication preferences for disclosing breast cancer risk in women with a family history

Teresa Ramón y Cajal, Víctor Navarro Garcés, Adrià López‐Fernández, Mònica Pardo, Rosa Alfonso, Joan Brunet, Judith Balmañà, Sara Torres‐Esquius, Esther Darder, Eduard Pérez‐Ballestero
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Effective breast cancer (BC) screening relies on shared decision-making and clear communication to help patients understand their risk and choose strategies aligned with that risk. The CanRisk tool was used to estimate BC risk in healthy women with a familial history of BC and the absence of a pathogenic variant in BC genes. Results were disclosed to patients using different formats, and data were collected to analyze the association between patient characteristics and risk communication preferences. Participants preferred their risk explained by percentages (59%) over fractions (15%), icon arrays (13%) or risk groups (13%) and 10-year risk estimation was favored to remaining lifetime risk (71% vs. 22%). Participants highlighted the use of positive and negative formats and comparison with the population's risk formats, and line graphic (61%) was selected over numerical table or a color-graph (19% each). However, participants with lower numeracy preferred color graphics (OR: 1.42; 95% CI 1.15-1.77 p = 0.001). The use of percentages, line graphics, and 10-year risk formats are highly accepted for healthy participants with a family history of BC, although adaptation may be needed for those with lower numeracy skills.

Journal of Genetic CounselingVol. 34(5)
Universitat de Girona (ES), Hospital de Sant Pau (ES), Odyssey House (US), Institut Català d'Oncologia (ES), Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari (ES), Duran i Reynals Hospital (ES), Hospital Universitari de Girona Doctor Josep Trueta (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
1.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.