Effects of dietary energy restriction of ultra-processed foods compared to a generic energy restriction on the intestinal microbiota of individuals with obesity: a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial

Evidence suggests that the intake of ultra-processed foods (UPF) influences gut microbiota. The present study evaluated the impact of energy restriction of dietary UPF compared to a general energy restriction on the gut microbiota of individuals with obesity. This was a parallel, randomized clinical trial. Individuals with obesity were randomly allocated into two groups: control, with general energy restriction (ER-G), and intervention, with energy restriction associated with UPF restriction (ER-UPF), limited to 5% of total intake. Individuals were followed-up monthly for 6 months. Stool samples were collected at baseline and after 6 months for DNA extraction and sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene (V3-V4 region). Socioeconomic, clinical, anthropometric, and dietary intake data were also collected. Abundance of microbiota data was analyzed using the Linear Models for Microarray Data (limma-voom) and the Microbiome Multivariable Associations with Linear Models (MaAsLin2) packages, with the Benjamini-Hochberg correction method. Alpha-diversity was analyzed using the Shannon, Simpson and Simpson-inverse index, whereas beta-diversity was analyzed using the Bray-Curtis index with the PERMANOVA test. Other variables were analyzed using mixed ANOVA with an alpha level of 5%. A total of 43 individuals were included, and at the end of the study, 34 individuals (18 intervention and 16 control) had complete data and were analyzed. %UPF consumption significantly decreased in the group that restricted UPF (<i>p</i>-interaction = 0.01), whereas waist circumference and body fat decreased in both groups (<i>p</i>-moment < 0.01). It was observed an increase in phylum and family microbial alpha-diversity in both groups with a slight decrease at the genus level. The <i>Ruminococcaceae</i> family showed a significantly greater increase in the ER-UPF group compared to the control group (<i>p</i>-interaction = 0.03), as did the <i>Faecalibacterium</i> genus (<i>p</i> = 0.02). These findings highlight the complexity of interactions between diet, body composition, and gut microbiota, suggesting that UPF restriction may have positive but limited effects on microbiota modulation in the short to medium term. Registration number of Clinical Trial: RBR - 3q9vgk9.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Food & Function
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1039/d5fo02449h
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.76
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of dietary energy restriction of ultra-processed foods compared to a generic energy restriction on the intestinal microbiota of individuals with obesity: a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial

Karine Maria Moreira Almeida, Nayara Gomes Graciliano, Mateus de Lima Macêna, Guilherme César Oliveira de Carvalho et al.
2 citations
Food & Function
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
3.76
article

Effects of dietary energy restriction of ultra-processed foods compared to a generic energy restriction on the intestinal microbiota of individuals with obesity: a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial

Karine Maria Moreira Almeida, Nayara Gomes Graciliano, Mateus de Lima Macêna, Guilherme César Oliveira de Carvalho, Fabiana Andréa Moura, Dafiny Rodrigues Silva Praxedes, Maria Bárbara Galdino-Silva, Ana Debora Santos de Oliveira, Nassib Bezerra Bueno, Bianca Luise Teixeira, Micnéias Róberth Pereira, João Victor Laurindo dos Santos, Débora Cavalcante Ferro, José Luiz de Brito Alves, André Eduardo da Silva Júnior, Marianna Victória Cerqueira Rocha, Déborah Tenório da Costa Paula, Natália Gomes da Silva Lopes, S Carvalho
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Evidence suggests that the intake of ultra-processed foods (UPF) influences gut microbiota. The present study evaluated the impact of energy restriction of dietary UPF compared to a general energy restriction on the gut microbiota of individuals with obesity. This was a parallel, randomized clinical trial. Individuals with obesity were randomly allocated into two groups: control, with general energy restriction (ER-G), and intervention, with energy restriction associated with UPF restriction (ER-UPF), limited to 5% of total intake. Individuals were followed-up monthly for 6 months. Stool samples were collected at baseline and after 6 months for DNA extraction and sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene (V3-V4 region). Socioeconomic, clinical, anthropometric, and dietary intake data were also collected. Abundance of microbiota data was analyzed using the Linear Models for Microarray Data (limma-voom) and the Microbiome Multivariable Associations with Linear Models (MaAsLin2) packages, with the Benjamini-Hochberg correction method. Alpha-diversity was analyzed using the Shannon, Simpson and Simpson-inverse index, whereas beta-diversity was analyzed using the Bray-Curtis index with the PERMANOVA test. Other variables were analyzed using mixed ANOVA with an alpha level of 5%. A total of 43 individuals were included, and at the end of the study, 34 individuals (18 intervention and 16 control) had complete data and were analyzed. %UPF consumption significantly decreased in the group that restricted UPF (<i>p</i>-interaction = 0.01), whereas waist circumference and body fat decreased in both groups (<i>p</i>-moment < 0.01). It was observed an increase in phylum and family microbial alpha-diversity in both groups with a slight decrease at the genus level. The <i>Ruminococcaceae</i> family showed a significantly greater increase in the ER-UPF group compared to the control group (<i>p</i>-interaction = 0.03), as did the <i>Faecalibacterium</i> genus (<i>p</i> = 0.02). These findings highlight the complexity of interactions between diet, body composition, and gut microbiota, suggesting that UPF restriction may have positive but limited effects on microbiota modulation in the short to medium term. Registration number of Clinical Trial: RBR - 3q9vgk9.

Food & FunctionVol. 16(20)
Universidade Federal da Paraíba (BR), Centro de Pesquisas Oncológicas (BR), Universidade Federal de Alagoas (BR), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
3.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.