Modelling Drivers of Grievance-Fuelled Violence

Acts of extreme or mass violence perpetrated by lone offenders have become increasingly common in liberal democracies over the past 20 years. Some describe these acts as ideologically motivated, while others attribute them to mental disorder or criminal intent. This has led to the development of distinct research and practice areas. However, there is an increasingly shared view that the distinction between political ideology, criminal intent and personal motivation is in fact blurred. There are an increasing number of instances where assigning an offender to a particular category has proven problematic, and this has led to an emerging consensus that the use of ideology as a marker for motivation may be flawed. This article supports an emerging area of research and argues that the motivation for the violence carried out by individuals conducting terrorism, mass murder, fixation, stalking, or familial and intimate partner homicide may be better understood through application of the concept of grievance-fueled violence. This work employs a multifaceted analytical approach to develop a holistic conceptual model of the processes of grievance development which is then tested on a sample of 120 offenders who either planned or committed an act of extreme or mass violence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Terrorism and Political Violence
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2025.2502405
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modelling Drivers of Grievance-Fuelled Violence

Adelaide Bragias, Emily Corner, Helen Taylor, Jacob Church
Terrorism and Political Violence
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
article

Modelling Drivers of Grievance-Fuelled Violence

Adelaide Bragias, Emily Corner, Helen Taylor, Jacob Church
article en

Abstract

Acts of extreme or mass violence perpetrated by lone offenders have become increasingly common in liberal democracies over the past 20 years. Some describe these acts as ideologically motivated, while others attribute them to mental disorder or criminal intent. This has led to the development of distinct research and practice areas. However, there is an increasingly shared view that the distinction between political ideology, criminal intent and personal motivation is in fact blurred. There are an increasing number of instances where assigning an offender to a particular category has proven problematic, and this has led to an emerging consensus that the use of ideology as a marker for motivation may be flawed. This article supports an emerging area of research and argues that the motivation for the violence carried out by individuals conducting terrorism, mass murder, fixation, stalking, or familial and intimate partner homicide may be better understood through application of the concept of grievance-fueled violence. This work employs a multifaceted analytical approach to develop a holistic conceptual model of the processes of grievance development which is then tested on a sample of 120 offenders who either planned or committed an act of extreme or mass violence.

Terrorism and Political ViolenceVol. 37(7)
Australian National University (AU)
Australian Institute of Criminology
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.