Breaking Bias: Addressing Ageism in Artificial Intelligence

Ageism, a pervasive form of discrimination based on age, has become a growing concern across various fields. Artificial Intelligence (AI), despite its transformative potential, may have unintentionally reinforced ageist stereotypes through flawed design, biased datasets, and implementation practices. This review delves into the complex interplay between ageism and AI, offering a thorough analysis of existing research on the subject and its consequences for older adults. It highlights significant gaps, including the underrepresentation of older individuals in datasets and the absence of age-inclusive design standards, which may perpetuate algorithmic biases. Ethical principles, policy development, and societal implications of ageist AI systems are critically assessed. Furthermore, the article proposes constructive strategies and outlines future research directions to promote equitable and inclusive AI systems. By addressing these challenges, this review aims to contribute to a fair and dignified technological landscape for all age groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Ageing and Longevity
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jal5030036
Primary Topic
Retirement, Disability, and Employment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Breaking Bias: Addressing Ageism in Artificial Intelligence

Diana Amundsen
Journal of Ageing and Longevity
Retirement, Disability, and Employment
article

Breaking Bias: Addressing Ageism in Artificial Intelligence

Diana Amundsen
article en

Abstract

Ageism, a pervasive form of discrimination based on age, has become a growing concern across various fields. Artificial Intelligence (AI), despite its transformative potential, may have unintentionally reinforced ageist stereotypes through flawed design, biased datasets, and implementation practices. This review delves into the complex interplay between ageism and AI, offering a thorough analysis of existing research on the subject and its consequences for older adults. It highlights significant gaps, including the underrepresentation of older individuals in datasets and the absence of age-inclusive design standards, which may perpetuate algorithmic biases. Ethical principles, policy development, and societal implications of ageist AI systems are critically assessed. Furthermore, the article proposes constructive strategies and outlines future research directions to promote equitable and inclusive AI systems. By addressing these challenges, this review aims to contribute to a fair and dignified technological landscape for all age groups.

Journal of Ageing and LongevityVol. 5(3)
University of Waikato (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Retirement, Disability, and Employment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.